Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Fitting the Means to the Ends: One School’s Experience with Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Curriculum Evaluation During Curriculum Change

By Ann W. Frye PhD, David J. Solomon PhD, Steven A. Lieberman MD and Ruth E. Levine MD


Curriculum evaluation plays an important role in substantive curriculum change. The experience of the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) with evaluation processes developed for the new Integrated Medical Curriculum (IMC) illustrates how evaluation methods may be chosen to match the goals of the curriculum evaluation process. Quantitative data such as ratings of courses or scores on external exams are useful for comparing courses or assessing whether standards have been met. Qualitative data such as students’ comments about aspects of courses are useful for eliciting explanations of observed phenomena and describing relationships between curriculum features and outcomes. The curriculum evaluation process designed for the IMC used both types of evaluation methods in a complementary fashion. Quantitative and qualitative methods have been used for formative evaluation of the new IMC courses. They are now being incorporated into processes to judge the IMC against its goals and objectives

Topics: MEO Peer Reviewed
Year: 2000
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (1992). Assessing clinical competence at the undergraduate level. Medical Education.
    2. (1998). Association of American Medical Colleges. Computers and medical informatics in the curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Medical Education.
    3. (1998). Association of American Medical Colleges. Emerging trends in the use of standardized patients. Contemporary Issues in Medical Education.
    4. (1998). Association of American Medical Colleges. Institutional Goals Ranking Report. Association of American Medical Colleges; doi
    5. (1994). Guidelines for assessing clinical competence. Teaching and Learning
    6. (1997). Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School. Association of American Medical Colleges,
    7. (1999). Patients don’t present with five choices: An alternative to multiplechoice tests in assessing physicians’ competence. Academic Medicine.
    8. (1999). Rating educational quality: Factors in the erosion of professional standards. Academic Medicine.
    9. (1998). Recent developments in assessing medical students. Pos graduate Medical Journal.
    10. (1996). The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.
    11. (1992). The assessment of professional competence. Evaluation and the Health Professions.
    12. (1983). The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Medical Education.
    13. (1996). The emperor’s new clothes: The OSCE reassessed. Academic Medicine. doi
    14. (1995). Validity of three clinical performance assessments of internal medicine clerks. Academic Medicine. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.