Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Pragmatic Roots of Context

By Bruce Edmonds


When modelling complex systems one can not include all the causal factors, but one has to settle for partial models. This is alright if the factors left out are either so constant that they can be ignored or one is able to recognise the circumstances when they will be such that the partial model applies. The transference of knowledge from the point of application to the point of learning utilises a combination of recognition and inference ­ a simple model of the important features is learnt and later situations where inferences can be drawn from the model are recognised. Context is an abstraction of the collection of background features that are later recognised. Different heuristics for recognition and model formulation will be effective for different learning tasks. Each of these will lead to a different type of context. Given this, there are (at least) two ways of modelling context: one can either attempt to investigate the contexts that arise out of the heuristics that a particular agent actually applies (the `internal' approach); or (if this is feasible) one can attempt to model context using the external source of regularity that the heuristics exploit. There are also two basic methodologies for the investigation of context: a top-down (or `foundationalist') approach where one tries to lay down general, a priori principles and a bottom-up (or `scientific') approach where one can try and find what sorts of context arise by experiment and simulation. A simulation is exhibited which is designed to illustrate the practicality of the bottom-up approach in elucidating the sorts of internal context that arise in an artificial agent which is attempting to learn simple models of a complex environment. It ends with a plea for the cooperation of the AI and Machine Learning communities as both learning and inference is needed if context is to make complete sense

Topics: Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Pragmatics, Philosophy of Science
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 1999
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1968). An Axiomatic Explanation of complete Self-Reproduction. doi
  2. (1994). Classical vs Non-classical Logics (The Univiversality of Classical Logic). In: Handbook of Logic, doi
  3. (1972). Complexity and Organisation. In:
  4. (1978). Complexity and the limits to knowledge.
  5. (1995). Computability, Self-Reference, and Self-Amendment. Commuincation and Cognition -
  6. (1980). Computability.
  7. Edmonds,B (forthcoming): What is Complexity? - the philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution.
  8. (1987). Intelligence in eye, the brain and the computer. AdisonWesley,
  9. (1967). Quantal noise and information.
  10. (1991). Self-Modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science: A New Framework for Dynamics, Information and Complexity. doi
  11. (1983). Situations and Attitudes.
  12. (1977). The First Three Minutes. doi
  13. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.