Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Seeing, Sensing, and Scrutinizing

By Ronald A Rensink


Large changes in a scene often become difficult to notice if made during an eye movement, image flicker, movie cut, or other such disturbance. It is argued here that this <i>change blindness</i> can serve as a useful tool to explore various aspects of vision. This argument centers around the proposal that focused attention is needed for the explicit perception of change. Given this, the study of change perception can provide a useful way to determine the nature of visual attention, and to cast new light on the way that it is—and is not—involved in visual perception. To illustrate the power of this approach, this paper surveys its use in exploring three different aspects of vision. The first concerns the general nature of <i>seeing</i>. To explain why change blindness can be easily induced in experiments but apparently not in everyday life, it is proposed that perception involves a <i>virtual representation</i>, where object representations do not accumulate, but are formed as needed. An architecture containing both attentional and nonattentional streams is proposed as a way to implement this scheme. The second aspect concerns the ability of observers to detect change even when they have no visual experience of it. This <i>sensing</i> is found to take on at least two forms: detection without visual experience (but still with conscious awareness), and detection without any awareness at all. It is proposed that these are both due to the operation of a nonattentional visual stream. The final aspect considered is the nature of visual attention itself—the mechanisms involved when <i>scrutinizing</i> items. Experiments using controlled stimuli show the existence of various limits on visual search for change. It is shown that these limits provide a powerful means to map out the attentional mechanisms involved

Topics: Cognitive Psychology, Perceptual Cognitive Psychology
Publisher: Pergamon
Year: 2000
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (1991). The plenoptic function and the elements of early vision. In
    2. (1992). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In
    3. (1999). Blind to object changes: when learning the same object at different levels of categorization modifies its perception.
    4. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception.
    5. (1980). Visualization and memorization as a function of display time and poststimulus processing time.
    6. (1991). Animate vision.
    7. (1932). Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge:
    8. Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes.
    9. (1998). Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals.
    10. (1998). Withdrawing attention at little cost: detection and discrimination tasks.
    11. (1975). Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements. doi
    12. (2000). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. doi
    13. (1994). A theory of visual stability across saccadic eye movements. doi
    14. (1991). Intelligence without representation. doi
    15. (1991). Measuring time to awareness. doi
    16. (1991). Temporal dissociation of motor responses and subjective awareness. doi
    17. (1973). Perception in chess. doi
    18. (1994). A critique of pure vision. In
    19. (1997). Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. doi
    20. (1991). Consciousness explained. doi
    21. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology.
    22. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory.
    23. (1984). On film editing.
    24. (1985). Four frames suffice: a provisional model of vision and space.
    25. (2000). Change detection without awareness: do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system.
    26. (1998). Active vision: Visual activity in everyday life.
    27. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.
    28. (1993). Visual routes to knowledge and action.
    29. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement.
    30. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In: K. Akins, Perception.
    31. (1984). A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision.
    32. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information.
    33. (1987). Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.
    34. (1992). Orienting of visual attention. In
    35. (1995). Capacity limitations in memory for visual locations.
    36. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures.
    37. (1998). Inattentional blindness.
    38. (1976). Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures.
    39. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: an approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes.
    40. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?
    41. (1997). Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness.
    42. (1992). Measuring unconscious perceptual processes. In
    43. (1995). The 6isual brain in action. Oxford:
    44. (1997). Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention.
    45. (1985). Biological motion processing: a review.
    46. (1976). Cognition and reality.
    47. (1975). Selective looking: attending to visually significant events.
    48. (1997). Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli.
    49. (1992). Solving the ‘real’ mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory.
    50. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking.
    51. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection.
    52. (1998). The psychology of attention.
    53. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory.
    54. (2000). Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.
    55. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP: an attentional blink?
    56. (1998). Mindsight: visual sensing without seeing.
    57. (1998). Limits to attentional selection for orientation.
    58. (1999). The magical number one, plus or minus zero.
    59. (1999). Attentional processing of geometric figures.
    60. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes.
    61. (1987). Implicit memory: history and current status.
    62. (1999). When are featural and spatiotemporal properties encoded as a result of attentional allocation?
    63. (2000). Comparison blindness.
    64. (1988). Conjurers ’ psychological secrets.
    65. (1996). In sight, out of mind: when object representations fail.
    66. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction.
    67. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations.
    68. (1997). Blindsight in man and monkey.
    69. (1989). A solution to the tag-assignment problem for neural networks.
    70. (1955). The fine structure of psychological time.
    71. (1991). Color indexing.
    72. (1976). Structured computer organization. Englewood Cliffs,
    73. (1999). Representing the ‘what’ and the ‘where’ of undetected change. doi
    74. (1991). The cogniti6e brain
    75. (1996). The binding problem. doi
    76. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. doi
    77. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention. doi
    78. (1996). Blindsight revisited. doi
    79. (1974). Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. doi
    80. (2000). Is ‘change blindness’ attenuated by domain-specific expertise? An expert-novices comparison of change detection in football images. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.