Article thumbnail

Ultrasensitive Responses and Specificity in Cell Signaling

By Seth Haney, Lee Bardwell and Qing Nie
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2940771
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). Bastiaens PI: Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate. Nat Cell Biol
  2. (2007). Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways. Nature Genetics
  3. (1981). DE: An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems.
  4. (2005). Derynck R: Specificity and versatility in tgf-beta signaling through Smads. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol
  5. (1996). Dick TP: Signal transduction: specificity of growth factors explained by parallel distributed processing. Med Hypotheses
  6. (2003). Divergence in the upstream signaling of nerve growth factor (NGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF). Neuroreport
  7. (2006). E: A modeling approach to quantify dynamic crosstalk between the pheromone and the starvation pathway in baker’s yeast.
  8. (2005). Elion EA: MAP kinase pathways.
  9. (2004). Fus3-regulated Tec1 degradation through SCFCdc4 determines MAPK signaling specificity during mating in yeast. Cell
  10. (2009). Glycosylation defects activate filamentous growth
  11. (2007). Goulian M: Specificity in two-component signal transduction pathways. Annu Rev Genet
  12. (2004). HD: Pheromonedependent destruction of the Tec1 transcription factor is required for MAP kinase signaling specificity in yeast. Cell
  13. (1998). Herskowitz I: The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev
  14. (2008). How quantitative measures unravel design principles in multi-stage phosphorylation cascades.
  15. (1999). Interactions between mitogenic stimuli, or, a thousand and one connections. Curr Opin Cell Biol
  16. (1999). Iyengar R: Complexity in biological signaling systems. Science
  17. (2002). Jr: Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. Curr Opin Cell Biol
  18. (1996). Jr: Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. Biochem Sci
  19. (2007). Kamorova N: Mathematical Models of Specificity in Cell Signaling. Biophys J
  20. (2005). L: A Theoretical Framework for Specificity in Cell Signaling. Nature Molecular Systems Biology
  21. (2006). Madhani HD: Control of MAPK signaling specificity by a conserved residue in the MEK-binding domain of the yeast scaffold protein Ste5. Curr Genet
  22. (2009). Madhani HD: Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) interrupts signal transduction between the
  23. (2004). Madhani HD: Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet
  24. (2006). MAPK signal specificity: the right place at the right time. Trends Biochem Sci
  25. (2009). Mechanisms and constraints on yeast MAPK signaling specificity.
  26. (2006). Mechanisms of MAPK signalling specificity. Biochem Soc Trans
  27. (2007). Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
  28. (2005). Mitogen-activated protein kinases with distinct requirements for Ste5 scaffolding influence signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol
  29. (2005). Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases with Distinct Requirements for Ste5 Scaffolding Influence Signaling Specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and Cellular Biolgy
  30. (1999). MJ: Mitogen-activated protein kinases: specific messages from ubiquitous messengers. Mol Cell Biol
  31. (2008). Modeling specificity in the yeast MAPK signaling networks.
  32. (2007). Moecular Cell Biology
  33. (2004). PheromoneDependent Destruction of the Tec1 Transcription Factor is Required for MAP Kinase Signaling Specificity in Yeast. Cell
  34. (2000). Protein-protein interactions define specificity in signal transduction. Genes Dev
  35. (2001). Pryciak PM: Role of scaffolds in MAP kinase pathway specificity revealed by custom design of pathway-dedicated signaling proteins. Curr Biol
  36. (2008). Rewiring the specificity of two-component signal transduction systems. Cell
  37. (1998). RJ: Structural organization of MAP-kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in yeast and mammals. Trends Biochem Sci
  38. (2000). Signaling networks: the origins of cellular multitasking. Cell
  39. (1999). SK: Signaling specificity: the RTK/RAS/MAP kinase pathway in metazoans. Trends Genet
  40. Sontag ED: Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems.
  41. (2004). Specificity in signal transduction: from phosphotyrosine-SH2 domain interactions to complex cellular systems. Cell
  42. (2001). Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. Mol Cell
  43. (1995). Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell
  44. (2002). T: Mathematical Models of Protein Kinase Signal Transduction. Molecular Cell
  45. (2000). Tasken K: Specificity in the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. Differential expression, regulation, and subcellular localization of subunits of PKA. Front Biosci
  46. (2007). TC: Kinetic insulation as an effective mechanism for achieving pathway specificity in intracellular signaling networks.
  47. (2007). The MEK/ERK cascade: from signaling specificity to diverse functions. Biochim Biophys Acta
  48. (2002). Westerhoff HV: Selectivity in overlapping MAP kinase cascades.