Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Regional differences in awareness and attitudes regarding genetic testing for disease risk and ancestry

By Charles R. Jonassaint, Eunice R. Santos, Crystal M. Glover, Perry W. Payne, Grace-Ann Fasaye, Nefertiti Oji-Njideka, Stanley Hooker, Wenndy Hernandez, Morris W. Foster, Rick A. Kittles and Charmaine D. Royal


Little is known about the lay public’s awareness and attitudes concerning genetic testing and what factors influence their perspectives. The existing literature focuses mainly on ethnic and socioeconomic differences; however, here we focus on how awareness and attitudes regarding genetic testing differ by geographical regions in the US. We compared awareness and attitudes concerning genetic testing for disease risk and ancestry among 452 adults (41% Black and 67% female) in four major US cities, Norman, OK; Cincinnati, OH; Harlem, NY; and Washington, DC; prior to their participation in genetic ancestry testing. The OK participants reported more detail about their personal ancestries (p = 0.02) and valued ancestry testing over disease testing more than all other sites (p < 0.01). The NY participants were more likely than other sites to seek genetic testing for disease (p = 0.01) and to see benefit in finding out more about one’s ancestry (p = 0.02), while the DC participants reported reading and hearing more about genetic testing for African ancestry than all other sites (p < 0.01). These site differences were not better accounted for by sex, age, education, self-reported ethnicity, religion, or previous experience with genetic testing/counseling. Regional differences in awareness and attitudes transcend traditional demographic predictors, such as ethnicity, age and education. Local sociocultural factors, more than ethnicity and socioeconomic status, may influence the public’s awareness and belief systems, particularly with respect to genetics

Topics: Original Investigation
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). Admixture mapping for hypertension loci with genomescan markers.
  2. (1996). African Americans and Native Americans in the Creek and Cherokee Nations, 1830s to 1920s: collision and collusion.
  3. (2010). Assessing the knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing for breast cancer risk in our region of southeastern Georgia.
  4. (2009). Barriers to the use of genetic testing: a study of racial and ethnic disparities. Genet Med 11(9):655–662 TallBear K
  5. (2004). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: access and marketing.
  6. (2005). Inferring African ancestry of African Americans. In: Turner T (ed) Biological anthropology and ethics.
  7. (2005). Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer.
  8. (2009). Rebbeck TR (2008) Genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer in men of African descent: implications for global disparities in incidence and outcomes.
  9. (2003). Sociocultural influences on participation in genetic risk assessment and testing among African American women. Patient Educ Couns 51(2): 107–114 International HapMap Consortium

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.