Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews

By Rebecca Ganann, Donna Ciliska and Helen Thomas
Topics: Methodology
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2914085
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. Health Technol Assess
  2. (2005). A: An Emerging Framework for Including Different Types of Evidence in Systematic Reviews for Public Policy. Evaluation
  3. (2003). A: Beyond Medline: reducing bias through extended systematic review search.
  4. (2006). A: Demonstrating the positive impact of information support on patient care in primary care: a rapid literature review. Health Info Libr J
  5. (2000). A: What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?
  6. (2009). Altman D: Enabling systematic reviews: reporting research with clarity, accuracy and transparency.
  7. (2007). Altman DG: Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med
  8. (2003). Australian Safety Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures Surgical: Spinal Cord Stimulation (Neurostimulation): An Accelerated Systematic Review.
  9. (2001). Burls A: A rapid review of new drug treatments for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Etanercept.
  10. (2003). Burls A: The clinical and costeffectiveness of anakinra for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults. Birmingham: West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration;
  11. (2008). Commission: Health Inequalities and Equality Impact Assessment of 'Healthcare for London: consulting the capital'.
  12. (1999). Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. IntJTechnolAssessHealth Care
  13. (2002). Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. IntJEpidemiol
  14. (1998). Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials
  15. (2001). Do extended searches fill the bill? Evaluating the quality of the literature retrieved.
  16. (2000). Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Lancet
  17. (2007). DP: A rapid evidence assessment of the impact of mentoring on re-offending: A summary.
  18. Draft proposal from RR Steering Group:
  19. (2007). E: Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. Health Technol Assess
  20. (2004). Evidence based approaches to reducing gang violence. West Midlands, UK: Government Social Research Unit;
  21. (2004). Evolving methods of technology appraisal.
  22. Feigin V: Rapid review of non-NHS treatments for smoking cessation.
  23. (2009). for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guide to the single technology appraisal process. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence;
  24. (2006). Fretheim A: Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 14. Reporting guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst
  25. (2006). Fretheim A: Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence. Health Res Policy Syst
  26. (2002). Fry-Smith A: Zanamivir for the treatment of influenza in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess
  27. (1998). GD: Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ
  28. (2005). Glasziou PP: Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.
  29. (2007). Grey literature in metaanalyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database SystRev
  30. (2007). Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Cochrane Database SystRev
  31. Health Development A: A Rapid Interim Review of the 'Grey' Literature on Risky Behaviour in Young People Aged 11-18 with a Special Emphasis on Vulnerable Groups.
  32. (2007). Health technology assessment in Canada: diversity and evolution.
  33. (2002). Health technology assessment in the United States. Past, present, and future.
  34. (1998). Hobbs FD: Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews. BMJ
  35. (2003). How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technology Assessment
  36. (1999). Identification of randomized controlled trials from the emergency medicine literature: comparison of hand searching versus MEDLINE searching. AnnEmergMed
  37. (2006). Improving care for people with long-term conditions: A review of UK and international frameworks. NHS,
  38. (2005). Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary.
  39. (2003). Literature searching for clinical and costeffectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health TechnolAssess
  40. (2003). Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. IntJTechnolAssessHealth Care
  41. (2006). Making the shift: A review of NHS experience.
  42. (2006). Making the shift: Key success factors. A rapid review of best practice in shifting hospital care into the community.
  43. (1998). Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paperbased journals. JAMA
  44. (2006). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Proposal for a Rapid Clinical Guidelines Programme.
  45. (2010). Organization: WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines on pharmacological management of humans infected with avian influenza A (H5N1) virus.
  46. (1996). Penna A: Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet
  47. (2007). Pulsed dye laser therapy for port wine stains [Technology Report number 78]. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health;
  48. (2005). Quick but Not Dirty: Rapid Evidence Assessments as a Decision Support Tool in Social Policy. London: Government Social Research Unit;
  49. (2006). Ramaekers D: Rapid assessment van nieuwe wervelzuil technologie├źn: totale discusprothese en vertebro/ ballon kyfoplastie.
  50. (2008). Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care
  51. Rapid versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice
  52. (2008). Rapid versus full systematic reviews: validity in clinical practice?
  53. (2004). Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: diversification of products and contextualization of findings.
  54. Reducing unplanned hospital admissions. What does the literature tell us? Birmingham and Black County Strategic Health Authority;
  55. (2007). Research (Ed.): Magenta Book Background Papers. Paper 2: what do we already know? Harnessing existing research.
  56. Revised rapid review of evidence for the effectiveness of screening for genital chlamydial infection in sexually active young women and men.
  57. (2003). Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline? J Clin Epidemiol
  58. (2004). Systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of varicose veins. Birmingham: West Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration;
  59. (2001). Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ
  60. (2005). Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews.
  61. (2001). ter RG: A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of orlistat in the management of obesity. Health Technol Assess
  62. (2006). The health technology inquiry service (HTIS): Providing information for Canadian health care decision makers.
  63. (2000). The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments.
  64. The Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development: Non-myeloablative bone marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation.
  65. (1998). TP: Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet
  66. (2003). TP: The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess
  67. (2005). Transforming chronic care. Evidence about improving care for people with long-term conditions.
  68. (2002). Wentz R: Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. StatMed

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.