Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Influence of Scale Preferences on the Design of a Water Innovation: A Case in Dutch River Management

By Heleen Vreudenhil, Jill Slinger, Emiel Kater and Wil Thissen

Abstract

The debate on scale use in river management focuses primarily on the (lack of) fit between the bio-geophysical and institutional systems. However, in this article we focus on the ‘subjective’ aspect of scale preferences in water governance. We apply an adapted version of the Integrated Scale Hierarchy for Rivers to determine the degree of fit between the scale preferences of the actors involved in a Dutch case study and the scale requirements of the innovative river management concept. This allows us to understand which riverine processes and characteristics are regarded as important by the different actors and to identify mismatches in scale perspectives as they manifest themselves in water management practice. We discover that inflexibility in scale use on the part of the involved actors places bounds on the design and quality of interventions and demonstrate that a more flexible use of scales in the design phase of a river management intervention has the potential to lead to more effective solutions

Topics: Article
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2911538
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). A new method of decision support to river flood management. In: Proceedings of the 1st international yellow river forum vol III,
  2. (2003). DSS-large rivers: developing a DSS under changing societal requirements.
  3. (2007). Lessons from an interdisciplinary project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 86(11):1593–1601 Moss T
  4. (1994). Myth and American politics. Policy Sciences 27:1–18
  5. (2004). New firms and regional development in Europe. Croom Helm, London Klijn F
  6. (2002). Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning 61:169–179 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management
  7. (2008). Press, Cambridge, pp 5–26 De Bruijn H, ten Heuvelhof E
  8. (2004). Research Memorandum 2000-42 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,
  9. (2001). Review on biogeomorphology in rivers: processes and scales.
  10. (2005). The Hague Rijkswaterstaat R

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.