Article thumbnail

Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety

By Valerie SL Williams, Robert J Morlock and Douglas Feltner
Topics: Research
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2904728
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). A double-blind multicenter trial comparing sertraline and fluoxetine in outpatients with major depression.
  2. (2004). Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: which coefficient should be used? Qual Life Res
  3. (1979). Czerlinsky T: Symptomatic volunteers in multicenter drug trials. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry
  4. (1970). Differential response to chlorpromazine, imipramine and placebo. A study of subgroups of depressed patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry
  5. (1982). Differentiating anxiety and depression in anxiety disorders: use of rating scales. Psychopharmacol Bull
  6. (2000). Doubleblind acute clonazepam vs. placebo in carbon dioxide-induced panic attacks. Psychiatry Res
  7. (1976). ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology
  8. (2005). Effects of lorazepam on fearpotentiated startle responses in man.
  9. (2003). Fleishaker JC: Anticipatory anxiety in moderately to highly-anxious oral surgery patients as a screening model for anxiolytics: evaluation of alprazolam.
  10. (2006). Food and Drug Administration: Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures--Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. In Draft guidance released for comment on February 3,
  11. (1998). Foreland AR: Direct assessment of improvement in winter depression with a visual analogue scale: high reliability and validity. Psychiatry Res
  12. (2003). GR: Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.
  13. (1989). Guyatt GH: Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clin Trials
  14. (1976). Hogg MI: The reliability of linear analogue scales for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia
  15. (1976). Huskisson EC: Graphic representation of pain. Pain
  16. (1981). Ignelzi RJ: Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain
  17. (2000). IM: d-Fenfluramine in panic disorder: a dual role for 5-hydroxytryptamine. Psychopharmacology
  18. (1989). In Educational measurement 3rd edition.
  19. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull
  20. (1987). JL: A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
  21. (2003). Liu-Dumaw M: Pregablalin in generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled trial.
  22. (1990). Lowe NK: A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health
  23. (2000). M: SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln RI: QualityMetric Incorporated;
  24. (1987). Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.
  25. (2002). Pharmacotherapy of generalized anxiety disorder.
  26. (2009). Psychometric performance and clinical meaningfulness of the Patient Assessment of Constipation -Quality of Life questionnaire in prucalopride (RESOLORĀ®) trials for chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil
  27. (1993). Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull
  28. (1981). Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis
  29. (2001). Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures.
  30. (1996). SC: Development of a new type of global quality of life scale, and comparison of performance and preference for 12 global scales. Qual Life Res
  31. (1992). Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care
  32. (1983). Snaith RP: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand
  33. (2004). Sprangers MAG: Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Qual Life Res
  34. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum;
  35. (2005). Streiner DL: Validation of a revised visual analogue scale for premenstrual mood symptoms: results from prospective and retrospective trials.
  36. (1989). TC: Chiropractic chronic low back pain sufferers and self-report assessment methods: I. A reliability study of the visual analogue scale, the pain drawing, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
  37. (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating.
  38. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Palliat Care
  39. (2000). Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer
  40. (1999). Wolinsky FD: Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life.
  41. (2003). Wyrwich KW: Interpretation of changes in healthrelated quality-of-life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care
  42. (1994). Zigmond AS: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Manual.