Article thumbnail

Winnowing the Chaff of Charlatanism from the Wheat of Science

By E. Ernst

Abstract

Experts and lay people alike can sometimes find it difficult to demarcate the absurd. Here I propose a set of criteria that may be helpful in achieving this in the realm of healthcare: falsifiability, plausibility and some hallmarks of pseudoscience. Applying this method is unlikely to be fool-proof but it might be a valuable aid in discriminating credible from incredible health claims

Topics: Commentary
Publisher: Oxford University Press
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2892356
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. Bioresonance, a study of pseudo-scientific language.
  2. (2008). Chelation therapy trials halted.
  3. (1986). Demarcation of the absurd.
  4. Spiritual healing: more than meets the eye.
  5. The historical aspect of quackery.