Article thumbnail

Value of the swimming position and arm traction in visualizing the cervicothoracic junction over the standard lateral cervical X-ray

By Aydin Toksoy, Firat Bektas, Cenker Eken, Kaan Ceken and Yildiray Cete
Topics: Original Research Article
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2885263
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma
  2. (1996). Cervical spine imaging in trauma patients: a simple scheme of rationalising arm traction using zonal divisions of the vertebral bodies.
  3. (1998). Do supine oblique views provide better imaging of the cervicothoracic junction than swimmer’s views?
  4. (1987). Evaluation of cervicothoracic junction injury.
  5. (1989). Incidence and diagnosis of C7-T1 fractures and subluxations in multiple-trauma patients: evaluation of the advanced trauma life support guidelines.
  6. (1981). New traction device for radiography of the lower cervical spine.
  7. (2005). Saifuddin A
  8. (1986). Shoulder harness traction for roentgenographic assessment of the cervical spine.
  9. (1978). Significant new observations on cervical spine trauma.
  10. (2007). The cervicothoracic junction.
  11. (2003). The effect of arm traction on the adequacy of cross-table lateral cervical spine radiographs.
  12. (2008). The swimmer’s view: does it really show what it is supposed to show? A retrospective study. BMC Med Imaging 15:2 Cenker Eken is 34 years old and has been working in the Emergency
  13. (2000). Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study Group.
  14. (1999). Where do we go after the three standard cervical spine views in the conscious trauma patient? A survey.