(2003). [Factors conditioning primary care services utilization. Empirical evidence and methodological inconsistencies]. Gac Sanit
(1989). [Proposal of an indica tor of "social class" based on the occupation]. Gac Sanit
A: Individual-Level Loss Aversion in Riskless and Risky Choices.
(2003). AC: Measuring the value of time for methadone maintenance clients: willingness to pay, willingness to accept, and the wage rate. Health Econ
(2008). Aggregation rules for cost-benefit analysis: a health economics perspective. Health Econ
(2005). AJ: Willingness to pay for preventive travel health measures among Hong Kong Chinese residents.
(2007). Amelung V: The value of health care: a matter of discussion in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res
(1998). Assessing the value of a new pharmaceutical. A feasibility study of contingent valuation in managed care. Med Care
(2009). Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ
(2008). Contingent valuation in health care: Does it matter how the 'good' is described? Health Econ
(2007). de Salud Pública y Alimentación: Informe
Dirección General de Atención al Paciente: Evaluación de la satisfacción de los usuarios de los
(2003). Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
(2004). Dyck R: A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry
(2005). Eeckhoudt L: The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers' and patients' willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care. Health Econ
(2000). Ervin LH: Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model. The American Statistician
(2005). Joore MA: Costeffectiveness acceptability curves and a reluctance to lose. Pharmacoeconomics
(2008). Joore MA: Willingness to Accept versus Willingness to Pay in a Discrete Choice Experiment. Value Health
(2006). JP: Impoverishment and patients' "willingness" and "ability" to pay for improving the quality of health care in Palestine: an assessment using the contingent valuation method. Health Policy
(1991). Kahneman D: Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice - a ReferenceDependent Model.
(2002). KE: A Review of WTA/WTP Studies.
(1994). Kliebenstein JB: Resolving differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingnes to Accept. Am Econ Rev
(2001). Kling CL: A new explanation for the WTP/WTA disparity. Econ Lett
(2007). Kolstad CHD: Researching Preferences, Valuation and Hypothetical Bias. Environmental and Resource Economics
(2002). LA: Is there a kink in consumers' threshold value for cost-effectiveness in health care? Health Econ
(2005). Onculer A: Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA-WTP disparity: A meta analytical framework.
(1993). Report of the NOAA Panel of Contingent Valuation. Federal Register
(2005). S: [Public healthcare coverage versus double healthcare coverage: what are the differences?]. Gac Sanit
(2007). Sach TH: WTP and WTA: do people think differently? Soc Sci Med
(2010). Sanz-Cuesta T: Perception of the economic value of primary care services: A willingness to pay study. Health Policy
(2002). The Role of 'Property Rights' in Determining Economic Values for Environmental Costs and Benefits. Report to The Environment Agency.
(2006). The usefulness of area-based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in health in Southern Europe.
(2004). Why cost-effectiveness should trump (clinical) efectiveness: the ethical economics of the SouthWest quadrant. Health Econ
(2009). Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Am Econ Rev 1991, 81:635-647. Additional file 1 Questionnaire. This is the questionnaire used in the study in a .doc format. Received: 5
(2007). Willingness to pay for social health insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation study. BMC Health Serv Res