Article thumbnail

Differences between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for visits by a family physician: A contingent valuation study

By Jesús Martín-Fernández, Ma Isabel del Cura-González, Tomás Gómez-Gascón, Juan Oliva-Moreno, Julia Domínguez-Bidagor, Milagros Beamud-Lagos and Francisco Javier Pérez-Rivas
Topics: Research article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). [Factors conditioning primary care services utilization. Empirical evidence and methodological inconsistencies]. Gac Sanit
  2. (1989). [Proposal of an indica tor of "social class" based on the occupation]. Gac Sanit
  3. A: Individual-Level Loss Aversion in Riskless and Risky Choices.
  4. (2003). AC: Measuring the value of time for methadone maintenance clients: willingness to pay, willingness to accept, and the wage rate. Health Econ
  5. (2008). Aggregation rules for cost-benefit analysis: a health economics perspective. Health Econ
  6. (2005). AJ: Willingness to pay for preventive travel health measures among Hong Kong Chinese residents.
  7. (2007). Amelung V: The value of health care: a matter of discussion in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res
  8. (1998). Assessing the value of a new pharmaceutical. A feasibility study of contingent valuation in managed care. Med Care
  9. (2009). Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ
  10. (2008). Contingent valuation in health care: Does it matter how the 'good' is described? Health Econ
  11. (2007). de Salud Pública y Alimentación: Informe
  12. Dirección General de Atención al Paciente: Evaluación de la satisfacción de los usuarios de los
  13. (2003). Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?
  14. (2004). Dyck R: A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry
  15. (2005). Eeckhoudt L: The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers' and patients' willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care. Health Econ
  16. (2000). Ervin LH: Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model. The American Statistician
  17. (2005). Joore MA: Costeffectiveness acceptability curves and a reluctance to lose. Pharmacoeconomics
  18. (2008). Joore MA: Willingness to Accept versus Willingness to Pay in a Discrete Choice Experiment. Value Health
  19. (2006). JP: Impoverishment and patients' "willingness" and "ability" to pay for improving the quality of health care in Palestine: an assessment using the contingent valuation method. Health Policy
  20. (1991). Kahneman D: Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice - a ReferenceDependent Model.
  21. (2002). KE: A Review of WTA/WTP Studies.
  22. (1994). Kliebenstein JB: Resolving differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingnes to Accept. Am Econ Rev
  23. (2001). Kling CL: A new explanation for the WTP/WTA disparity. Econ Lett
  24. (2007). Kolstad CHD: Researching Preferences, Valuation and Hypothetical Bias. Environmental and Resource Economics
  25. (2002). LA: Is there a kink in consumers' threshold value for cost-effectiveness in health care? Health Econ
  26. (2005). Onculer A: Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA-WTP disparity: A meta analytical framework.
  27. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel of Contingent Valuation. Federal Register
  28. (2005). S: [Public healthcare coverage versus double healthcare coverage: what are the differences?]. Gac Sanit
  29. (2007). Sach TH: WTP and WTA: do people think differently? Soc Sci Med
  30. (2010). Sanz-Cuesta T: Perception of the economic value of primary care services: A willingness to pay study. Health Policy
  31. (2002). The Role of 'Property Rights' in Determining Economic Values for Environmental Costs and Benefits. Report to The Environment Agency.
  32. (2006). The usefulness of area-based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in health in Southern Europe.
  33. (2004). Why cost-effectiveness should trump (clinical) efectiveness: the ethical economics of the SouthWest quadrant. Health Econ
  34. (2009). Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Am Econ Rev 1991, 81:635-647. Additional file 1 Questionnaire. This is the questionnaire used in the study in a .doc format. Received: 5
  35. (2007). Willingness to pay for social health insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation study. BMC Health Serv Res