Article thumbnail

Predicting growth and curve progression in the individual patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: design of a prospective longitudinal cohort study

By Iris Busscher, Frits Hein Wapstra and Albert G Veldhuizen
Topics: Study protocol
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2881883
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). A: Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile scoliosis during pubertal growth. Spine
  2. (2002). AG: Curve progression and spinal growth in brace treated idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform
  3. (2005). al: A preliminary study on electromyographic analysis of the paraspinal musculature in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J
  4. (2002). al: The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine. Eur Spine J
  5. (2003). Albertsson-Wikland K: Pubertal growth assessment. Horm Res
  6. (1997). BS: Prediction of the crankshaft phenomenon by peak height velocity. Spine
  7. (1993). Diurnal variation of Cobb angle measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine
  8. (2006). Effect of growth velocity on the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in boys.
  9. (2007). Finegold DN: Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis.
  10. (2009). FM: Early markers of pubertal onset: height and foot size.
  11. (1978). Foetus into Man. Physical Growth from Conception to Maturity OBP London
  12. Growth at Adolescence Oxford:
  13. (2001). Growth in pediatric orthopaedics.
  14. (2003). Height of girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
  15. (2000). Herring JA: Relationship of peak height velocity to other maturity indicators in idiopathic scoliosis in girls.
  16. (1999). Hughes IA: Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods. Arch Dis Child
  17. (2005). Kabore B: Accuracy of the Sauvegrain method in determining skeletal age during puberty.
  18. (2000). Kanade A: Growth in some physical dimensions in relation to adolescent growth spurt among rural Indian children. Ann Hum Biol
  19. (2007). Maturity indicators in spinal deformity.
  20. (2008). Mundfrom D: Sample sizes when using multiple linear regression for prediction. Ed Psy Measurement
  21. (2001). Paediatric morphometrics: a reference manual, Second extended edition edn UPM
  22. (1991). Prebeg Z: A longitudinal study of growth velocity and development of secondary gender characteristics versus onset of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res
  23. (1968). Prediction of height from foot length: Use of measurement in field surveys. Arch Dis Child
  24. (1992). Reevaluation of the use of the Risser sign in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine
  25. (1995). Relationship between height, sitting height and subischial leg length in Dutch children: presentation of normal values. Acta Paediatr
  26. (1982). RH: A longitudinal analysis of the growth of limb segments in adolescence. Ann Hum Biol
  27. (2006). SA: Correlates of the peak height velocity in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine
  28. (1999). Spinal growth and a histologic evaluation of the Risser grade in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine
  29. (1994). Sussman MD: The Risser sign: a critical analysis.
  30. (1979). T: The timing of adolescent growth spurts of 8 body dimensions in boys and girls of the Wroclaw growth study. Stud Phys Anthrop
  31. (1976). The relation between electromyography and growth velocity of the spine in the evaluation of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa
  32. (2001). Timing and magnitude of peak height velocity and peak tissue velocities for early, average, and late maturing boys and girls.
  33. (1956). WT: Growth of the normal foot during childhood and adolescence; length of the foot and interrelations of foot, stature, and lower extremity as seen in serial records of children between 1-18 years of age.