Article thumbnail

Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and De Novo Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends

By John R. Lydeard, Zachary Lipkin-Moore, Suvi Jain, Vinay V. Eapen and James E. Haber

Abstract

In budding yeast, an HO endonuclease-inducible double-strand break (DSB) is efficiently repaired by several homologous recombination (HR) pathways. In contrast to gene conversion (GC), where both ends of the DSB can recombine with the same template, break-induced replication (BIR) occurs when only the centromere-proximal end of the DSB can locate homologous sequences. Whereas GC results in a small patch of new DNA synthesis, BIR leads to a nonreciprocal translocation. The requirements for completing BIR are significantly different from those of GC, but both processes require 5′ to 3′ resection of DSB ends to create single-stranded DNA that leads to formation of a Rad51 filament required to initiate HR. Resection proceeds by two pathways dependent on Exo1 or the BLM homolog, Sgs1. We report that Exo1 and Sgs1 each inhibit BIR but have little effect on GC, while overexpression of either protein severely inhibits BIR. In contrast, overexpression of Rad51 markedly increases the efficiency of BIR, again with little effect on GC. In sgs1Δ exo1Δ strains, where there is little 5′ to 3′ resection, the level of BIR is not different from either single mutant; surprisingly, there is a two-fold increase in cell viability after HO induction whereby 40% of all cells survive by formation of a new telomere within a few kb of the site of DNA cleavage. De novo telomere addition is rare in wild-type, sgs1Δ, or exo1Δ cells. In sgs1Δ exo1Δ, repair by GC is severely inhibited, but cell viaiblity remains high because of new telomere formation. These data suggest that the extensive 5′ to 3′ resection that occurs before the initiation of new DNA synthesis in BIR may prevent efficient maintenance of a Rad51 filament near the DSB end. The severe constraint on 5′ to 3′ resection, which also abrogates activation of the Mec1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint, permits an unprecedented level of new telomere addition

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2877739
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (in press) Break-induced replication requires all essential DNA replication factors except those specific for Pre-RC assembly. Genes Dev.
  2. A (2002) SGS1 is a multicopy suppressor of srs2: functional overlap between DNA helicases.
  3. (2001). A DNA damage response pathway controlled by
  4. (1987). A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains.
  5. (2009). A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair.
  6. (1989). A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA
  7. (2009). Analysis of repair mechanism choice during homologous recombination.
  8. (2003). ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism.
  9. (2007). BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules.
  10. (2008). Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response.
  11. (2006). Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast.
  12. (2007). Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32.
  13. (2008). Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for?
  14. (2002). Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences.
  15. (1988). Characterization of two telomeric DNA processing reactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  16. (2001). Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast.
  17. (2006). Chromosome healing by de novo telomere addition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  18. (2005). Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage.
  19. (2003). crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast.
  20. (2010). Defective resection at DNA double-strand breaks leads to de novo telomere formation and enhances gene targeting.
  21. (2004). DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation.
  22. (2009). DNA damage signalling prevents deleterious telomere addition at DNA breaks.
  23. (2004). DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1.
  24. (1996). Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced replication.
  25. (2007). Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks.
  26. (2004). Examination of the roles of
  27. (2007). Excess single-stranded DNA inhibits meiotic double-strand break repair.
  28. (2005). Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells.
  29. (2008). Flexibility of eukaryotic Okazaki fragment maturation through regulated strand displacement synthesis.
  30. (2007). Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map.
  31. (2001). Genetic requirements for RAD51- and RAD54-independent break-induced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break.
  32. (1999). Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants.
  33. (2004). Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires
  34. (2008). Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from humans and yeast.
  35. (2007). Measuring the rate of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A practical approach to study genomic rearrangements observed in cancer.
  36. (2008). Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination.
  37. (2006). Mobile D-loops are a preferred substrate for the Bloom’s syndrome helicase.
  38. (2001). Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  39. (1999). Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  40. (2009). Multiple pathways regulate 39 overhang generation at S. cerevisiae telomeres.
  41. (2008). Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis.
  42. (1997). Mutations in yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen define distinct sites for interaction with DNA polymerase delta and DNA polymerase epsilon.
  43. (2004). Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genomewide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  44. (2003). New ‘marker swap’ plasmids for converting selectable markers on budding yeast gene disruptions and plasmids.
  45. (1993). New telomeres in yeast are initiated with a highly selected subset of TG1-3 repeats.
  46. (2005). RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion.
  47. (2001). RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer site.
  48. (2004). Recombination proteins in yeast.
  49. (2007). RECQL5/Recql5 helicase regulates homologous recombination and suppresses tumor formation via disruption of Rad51 presynaptic filaments.
  50. (2008). Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATM orthologue suppresses break-induced chromosome translocations.
  51. (2008). Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks.
  52. (2006). Sgs1 regulates gene conversion tract lengths and crossovers independently of its helicase activity.
  53. (2001). SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination.
  54. (2005). Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks.
  55. (2006). Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants.
  56. Symington LS (2004) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast.
  57. (2001). Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants.
  58. (2003). The Bloom’s syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination.
  59. (2004). The CDK regulates repair of doublestrand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle.
  60. (2010). The full-length Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sgs1 protein is a vigorous DNA helicase that preferentially unwinds holliday junctions.
  61. (1994). The saccharomyces PIF1 DNA helicase inhibits telomere elongation and de novo telomere formation.
  62. (2007). The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage.
  63. (1992). Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated.