Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

De novo backbone scaffolds for protein design

By James T MacDonald, Katarzyna Maksimiak, Michael I Sadowski and William R Taylor

Abstract

In recent years, there have been significant advances in the field of computational protein design including the successful computational design of enzymes based on backbone scaffolds from experimentally solved structures. It is likely that large-scale sampling of protein backbone conformations will become necessary as further progress is made on more complicated systems. Removing the constraint of having to use scaffolds based on known protein backbones is a potential method of solving the problem. With this application in mind, we describe a method to systematically construct a large number of de novo backbone structures from idealized topological forms in a top–down hierarchical approach. The structural properties of these novel backbone scaffolds were analyzed and compared with a set of high-resolution experimental structures from the protein data bank (PDB). It was found that the Ramachandran plot distribution and relative γ- and β-turn frequencies were similar to those found in the PDB. The de novo scaffolds were sequence designed with RosettaDesign, and the energy distributions and amino acid compositions were comparable with the results for redesigned experimentally solved backbones. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2841848
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). A ‘periodic table’ for protein structures.
  2. A de novo designed protein protein interface.
  3. (1984). A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins.
  4. (1976). A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding.
  5. (1997). Algorithm for rapid reconstruction of protein backbone from alpha carbon coordinates.
  6. Alteration of enzyme specificity by computational loop remodeling and design.
  7. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes.
  8. Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition.
  9. Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations.
  10. Computational de novo design, and characterization of an A(2)B(2) diiron protein.
  11. Computational design of protein-protein interactions.
  12. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions.
  13. Computationally designed libraries of fluorescent proteins evaluated by preservation and diversity of function.
  14. (1975). Computer simulation of protein folding.
  15. (2006). Computer-based design of novel protein structures. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct
  16. Computer-based redesign of a beta sandwich protein suggests that extensive negative design is not required for de novo beta sheet design.
  17. De novo backbone and sequence design of an idealized alpha/betabarrel protein: evidence of stable tertiary structure.
  18. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes.
  19. (1995). De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci
  20. (1997). De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection.
  21. Defining linear segments in protein structure.
  22. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy.
  23. Exploring the origins of binding specificity through the computational redesign of calmodulin.
  24. Exploring the parameter space of the coarse-grained UNRES force field by random search: selecting a transferable medium-resolution force field.
  25. Generalized dead-end elimination algorithms make large-scale protein side-chain structure prediction tractable: implications for protein design and structural genomics.
  26. Inaugural article: retrostructural analysis of metalloproteins: application to the design of a minimal model for diiron proteins.
  27. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design.
  28. (1995). Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins
  29. Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.
  30. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.
  31. Nature of the protein universe.
  32. (2006). New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci
  33. (2004). Orientational potentials extracted from protein structures improve native fold recognition. Protein Sci
  34. Prediction of protein-protein interface sequence diversity using flexible backbone computational protein design.
  35. Probing the ‘‘dark matter’’ of protein fold space.
  36. Progress towards mapping the universe of protein folds.
  37. (1993). Protein fold refinement: building models from idealized folds using motif constraints and multiple sequence data. Protein Eng
  38. Protein structure comparison using SAP.
  39. (1994). Pseudodihedrals: simplified protein backbone representation with knowledge-based energy.
  40. (2009). RosettaHoles: rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation. Protein Sci
  41. (1995). SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures.
  42. (1999). Side-chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design.
  43. Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures.
  44. The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances.
  45. (1996). VMD: visual molecular dynamics.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.