Location of Repository

Double Fantasy: The antinomic relationship between technical discipline and project integrity

By Jonathan Sapsed

Abstract

This paper addresses a key interest in Keith Pavitt’s later work (Pavitt, 1998; 2002); the organisational arrangements for co-ordinating technological knowledge. It also concurs with Pavitt’s insistence on the constraints on managerial agency and his nihilistic amusement at frustrated plans.\ud The paper analyses two case studies of organisations attempting to manage transitions aimed at improved co-ordination processes. These are similar firms in high-tech, multi-technology, knowledge-intensive businesses. Both are project-based, in the same geographical region and about the same size, yet they have taken their organisations in contrary directions. The first has moved from organisation around functional disciplines to product-based, cross-functional teams, while the second has done the reverse. The paper reviews the effects of these different organisational solutions on the processes of knowledge integration within the firms, the effects on communities of practice and the ways in which the systems have developed and adapted in response to the reorganisations. It challenges many of the simplistic prescriptions offered in the literature and provides further fuel for the debates over corporate initiatives and the knowledge integration task

Topics: N215 Change and Innovation, N213 Project management
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.brighton.ac.uk:4421

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development’. doi
  2. (1995). Accelerating Adaptive Processes: doi
  3. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. doi
  4. (1971). Beyond the Stable State : Public and Private Learning in a Changing Society. London : Maurice Temple Smith.
  5. (1992). Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams’. doi
  6. (2000). Category Work and Knowledgeability within Multidisciplinary Team Meetings. doi
  7. (1994). Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations. doi
  8. (2000). Critical Success Factors for Cross-Functional Teamwork in New Product Development. doi
  9. (2001). Cross-Functional Project Groups in Research and New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress, and Outcomes. doi
  10. (1993). Crossfunctional Teams in Product Development: Accommodating the Structure to the Process. doi
  11. (1972). Designing Complex Organizations.
  12. (1996). From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model. doi
  13. (2001). How Leaders Foster Self-Managing Team Effectiveness: Design Choices Versus Hands-On Coaching’. doi
  14. (2002). Innovating Routines in the Business Firm: What corporate tasks should they be accomplishing’. doi
  15. (1987). Introduction: Managing Technological Innovation- A Search for Generalizations.
  16. (2001). Knowledge and Organization: A Social - Practice Perspective. doi
  17. (2001). Knowledge and Organization. doi
  18. (2001). Knowledge Specialisation, Organisational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: doi
  19. (1984). Managing the Flow of Technology:Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. doi
  20. (1997). Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies. doi
  21. (1984). Occupational Communities: Culture and Control in Organizations.
  22. (1974). On Owning Knowledge.
  23. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation’. doi
  24. (1995). Organizing Knowledge Work Systems.
  25. (1997). PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices. doi
  26. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically- Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration’. doi
  27. (1987). Relative Effectiveness of Different Project Structures.
  28. (1981). Self-Serving and Group-Serving Bias in Attribution. doi
  29. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: doi
  30. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organisation. doi
  31. (2000). Strategies for Managing the Teamworking Agenda: Developing a Methodology for Team-Based Organization. doi
  32. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence’. doi
  33. (2002). Teamworking and Knowledge Management: A Review of Converging Themes’. doi
  34. (1998). Technologies, Products & Organisation in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t’. doi
  35. (1996). The “Honda Effect” Revisited’. California Management Review. doi
  36. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. doi
  37. (2000). The Project-Based Organisation: An Ideal Form for Managing Complex Products and Systems?’. doi
  38. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. doi
  39. (1998). The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. doi
  40. (1999). The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits. doi
  41. (1987). The Social Locus of Technological Practice: Community, System or Organisation.
  42. (1996). Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm’. doi
  43. (1985). Uncertainty and Technical Communication Patterns’. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.