Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Resolving the Quantitative-Qualitative Dilemma: A Critical Realist Approach

By David Scott

Abstract

The philosophical issues underpinning the quantitative–qualitative divide in educational research are examined. Three types of argument which support a resolution are considered: pragmatism, false duality and warranty through triangulation. In addition a number of proposed strategies—alignment, sequencing, translation and triangulation—are critically assessed. The article concludes by suggesting that many of these ways of reconciling quantitative and qualitative methods and approaches are still deficient in relation to the development of an overarching and correct view of ontological and epistemological matters, and that critical realism offers a more coherent solution, where the reconciliation occurs at the ontological level

Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:5568

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A critical epistemology of analytical statistics: addressing the sceptical realist, Paper presented to the British Sociological Association,
  2. (2003). Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education class size study of children aged 5–7 years,
  3. (2006). Compounding mixed-methods problems in frame analysis through comparative research,
  4. (2002). Critical realism and critical philosophy,
  5. (2005). Critical realism and research methods in education, doi
  6. (2003). Editorial—’In praise of educational research’,
  7. (1999). Educational research: pursuit of truth or flight into fancy,
  8. (1995). Ethnography: principles in practice (2nd Edn)
  9. (2005). Explanation and quantification in educational research: the arguments of critical and scientific realism,
  10. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective,
  11. (1990). Human agency and social structure: a critique of Giddens, in:
  12. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?
  13. (1998). Introduction: basic texts and developments,
  14. (1992). Method in social science doi
  15. (1999). Methodological triangulation, or how to get lost without being found out, in:
  16. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come,
  17. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way,
  18. (1989). Reclaiming reality
  19. (2002). Researching effective pedagogy in the early years (London, Department for Education and Skills).
  20. (1996). Rural Indian social relations (Delhi,
  21. (2000). The ‘false dualism’ of educational research, doi
  22. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research
  23. (1982). The essential Peirce, 2 vols. Edited by Nathan Houser, Christian Kloesel, and the Peirce Edition Project doi
  24. (1979). The possibility of naturalism (London,
  25. (2006). The process—product metaphor of education and the effects of examination boards on teaching and learning: an analysis of the teaching-learning environment in advanced subsidiary education, EdD Thesis,
  26. (2006). Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.