Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Higher education funding reforms in England : the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs

By Lorraine Dearden, Emla Fitzsimons, Alissa Goodman and Greg Kaplan

Abstract

This paper undertakes a quantitative analysis of substantial reforms to the system of higher education (HE) finance first announced in 2004 and then revised again in July 2007. The reforms introduced deferred fees for HE, payable by graduates through the tax system in the form of income-contingent repayments on loans subsidised by the government. Lifetime earnings that have been simulated by the authors using innovative methods, are used to analyse the likely distributional consequences of the reforms for graduates. It is shown that graduates with low lifetime earnings will pay less for their HE than graduates higher up the lifetime earnings distribution compared to the system operating before the reforms. Taxpayers will bear substantial costs due to the interest rate and debt write-off subsidies. The extent to which the reforms are likely to shift the balance of funding for HE between the public and private sector is also analysed, as well as the likely distributional consequences of a number of variations to the system such as removing the interest subsidy from the loans

Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:5340

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1993). Alternative funding resources for higher education’,
  2. (2001). An estimable dynamic general equilibrium model of work, schooling and occupational choice’,
  3. (1999). An Introduction to Copulas’.
  4. (2005). Assessing Lifetime Inequality with Short Panels, with an Application to France, 1990-2002’, CREST-INSEE and CEPR.
  5. (2003). Education and Skills.
  6. (2006). Education decisions and policy interventions: a general equilibrium evaluation’, mimeo,
  7. (1995). Education funding, equity and the life cycle', in The Dynamic of Welfare: The Welfare State and the Life Cycle.
  8. (2006). Efficient Estimation of Semiparametric Multivariate Copula Models’,
  9. (2006). Estimation of Multivariate Models for Time Series of Possibly Different Lengths’,
  10. (2005). Financing higher education: answers from the UK', London and
  11. (1959). Fonctions de Repartition a n Dimensions et leurs
  12. (2003). Funding higher education in the UK: The role of fees and loans’,
  13. (1998). General equilibrium treatment effects: a study of tuition policy’,
  14. (2005). Higher education funding policy: a guide to the debate’, Election Briefing Note no. 67, Institute for Fiscal Studies
  15. (2004). Higher education funding’,
  16. (2005). Income contingent loans for higher education: international reform’,
  17. (2006). Modelling Asymmetric Exchange Rate Dependence’,
  18. (1997). Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts’.
  19. (1995). On the political economy of education subsidy’,
  20. (2006). Open Universities. A Funding Strategy for Higher Education, Centre Forum (http://www.centreforum.org/Assetts/open_universities.pdf).
  21. (1975). Some problems in the use of income-contingent loans for the finance of higher education’,
  22. (2002). Tax and education policy in a heterogeneous-agent economy: what levels of redistribution maximize growth and efficiency?’,
  23. (1980). Taxation, human capital and uncertainty’,
  24. (1997). The career decisions of young men’,
  25. (2002). The design of optimal education policies’,
  26. (1974). The effect of risk on the investment in human capital’,
  27. (1955). The role of government in education’,
  28. (2005). The t Copula and Related Copulas’,
  29. (1986). Uncertainty and the demand for education’,
  30. (2005). User-charging in public services: the case of tuition fees for Higher Education’, in Charging Ahead? Spreading the Costs of Modern Public Services

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.