Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Teaching in Hong Kong: Professionalization, Accountability and the State

By Paul Morris

Abstract

This article traces the processes for encouraging and/or ensuring the accountability of teachers in Hong Kong. It is argued that, if examined historically, the nature of teacher accountability has been determined by the government, whose approach has been ambivalent and paradoxical. Up until the mid 1980s, through inertia and nondecisions, the government maintained the low level of professionalization of teaching. Subsequently, from the late 1980s onwards, it resisted and diluted attempts by the professional community to regulate itself. Most recently it has actively sought to introduce systems to allow the government to scrutinize teachers in an ostensible attempt to promote the level of teacher professionalism. These changes are analysed in terms of the differences between professionalism and professionalization, and with reference to the government’s own legitimacy and the changing political context

Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:4752

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1993). A Phoenix Transformed: The Reconstruction of Education in Post-war Hong Kong. doi
  2. (2002). A Tale of Two Teachers - Teachers Responses to an Imposed Curriculum Reform. Teacher Development: An
  3. (2000). Accountability’: An Ever-expanding Concept?
  4. (2002). Between Liberal Autocracy and Democracy: Democratic Legitimacy in Hong Kong.
  5. (1990). Decentralization and School-based Management.
  6. (1994). Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. London & Washington DC:
  7. (1992). Education Commission Report No. 5. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
  8. (2003). Educational Reform and Policy Implementation in Hong Kong.
  9. (1997). Empowerment of the Powerless Through the Politics of the Apolitical: Teacher Professionalism in Hong Kong.
  10. (2001). Hong Kong Secondary School Teachers’ Understanding of Their Careers. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong Code for the Education Profession of Hong Kong
  11. (2000). Learning Without Tears: The Relativity of a Curriculum Reform and its Impact. In
  12. (2001). Profile of the Teaching Profession in Hong Kong in the 1990s (update of Teacher Education Planning Digest, Issue 5). Hong Kong: Office of Planning and Academic Implementation, The Hong Kong Institute of Education.
  13. (2002). Promoting Curriculum Reforms in the Context of a Political Transition: an Analysis of Hong Kong’s Experience.
  14. (2003). Report of the Teaching and Learning Quality Process Review Panel
  15. (1997). School Knowledge, the State and the Market: an Analysis of the Hong Kong Secondary School Curriculum.
  16. (2000). Teacher Control and the Reform of Professional Development. In H. Altrichter &
  17. (2000). Teacher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: a Comparative Study.
  18. (2001). The Disarticulation of Hong Kong’s Post-handover Political System. doi
  19. (1996). The Hong Kong School Curriculum: Development, Issues and Policies. 2nd Edition. Hong Kong: Hong Kong
  20. (1977). The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis.
  21. (1992). The Search for Local Accountability. In
  22. (1969). The Semi-Professions and their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers.
  23. (1986). Tomorrow’s Teachers. East

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.