Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Reconfiguring Interactivity, Agency and Pleasure in the Education and Computer Games Debate – using Žižek’s concept of interpassivity to analyse educational play

By Caroline Pelletier

Abstract

Digital or computer games have recently attracted the interest of education researchers and policy-makers for two main reasons: their interactivity, which is said to allow greater agency, and their inherent pleasures, which is linked to increased motivation to learn. However, the relationship between pleasure, agency and motivation in educational technologies is under-theorised. This paper aims to situate these concepts within a framework that might identify more precisely how games can be considered to be educational. The framework is based on Zizek’s theory of subjectivity in cyberspace, and in particular his notion of interpassivity, which is defined in relation to interactivity. The usefulness of this concept is explored firstly by examining three approaches to theorizing cyberspace and their respective manifestations in key texts on educational game play. Zizek’s analysis of cyberspace in terms of socio-symbolic relations is then outlined to suggest how games might be considered educational insofar as they provide opportunities to manipulate and experiment with the rules underpinning our sense of reality and identity. This resembles Brecht’s notion of the educational value of theatre. The conclusion emphasizes that the terms on which games are understood to be educational relates to the social interests which education is understood to serve

Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:3191

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. doi
  2. (2003). Department for Education and Skills doi
  3. (2001). Digital game-based learning.
  4. (1999). Is it possible to traverse the fantasy in cyberspace?, in E. Wright & E. Wright (Eds) The Zizek reader.
  5. (1995). Life on the screen: identity in the age of the internet.
  6. (2004). Literature review on games and learning.
  7. (1999). Politics and the impossible: beyond psychoanalysis and deconstruction, doi
  8. (1999). Politics of the Very Worst: An Interview with Philippe Petit.
  9. (2002). Report on the educational use of games: An exploration by TEEM on the contribution which games can make to the educational process.
  10. (2003). Rules of play: the fundamentals of game design.
  11. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor:
  12. (1986). Teachers and Machines: the classroom use of technology since doi
  13. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge MA:
  14. (1994). The Gutenberg Elegies: the fate of reading in an electronic age. doi
  15. (1997). The plague of fantasies.
  16. (1989). The sublime object of ideology.
  17. (1999). The Ticklish Subject: the absent centre of political ontology.
  18. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning: a review of the literature. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
  19. (2004). Videogames of the Oppressed: critical thinking, education, tolerance and other trivial issues, in P. Harrington & N. Wardrip-Fruin (Eds) First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game.
  20. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.