Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Expansion without equity: an analysis of current policy on access to higher education in Brazil

By Tristan McCowan

Abstract

Access to higher education in Brazil is to a large extent restricted to the higher socioeconomic groups. Public universities have limited places and entry is determined by highly competitive exams, thereby excluding those who have not had a high quality secondary education or attended an expensive preparatory course. There has been considerable growth in the private sector to absorb the excess demand, but the majority of Brazilians cannot afford the fees. This paper develops a concept of equity in higher education in which, firstly, there should be sufficient places in the system as a whole and, secondly, all people should have a fair opportunity of attending the university of their choice regardless of socioeconomic background. Recent efforts to expand access are analyzed, including incentives for the growth of private universities, student loans and the new Prouni initiative, in which private institutions provide free places to low-income students in return for tax exemptions. While these initiatives have the potential to increase the total number of places, they will not lead to an equitable expansion, as disadvantaged students will still be confined to courses of lower quality or with lower subsequent value on the employment market. Initiatives aimed at the public sector such as the introduction of quotas and changes to entry examinations are also discussed. Finally, some implications for future policy development are outlined

Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:2526

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). A universidade na penumbra: o círculo vicioso da precariedade e a privatização do espaço público. In P. Gentili (Ed) Universidades na Penumbra. São Paulo:
  2. (2003). Censo da educação superior
  3. (2000). Censo Demográfico 2000: Educação, Resultados da Amostra. Rio de Janeiro:
  4. (2004). de (2004) As más lições da experiência: as reformas da educação superior no Chile e na China e suas semelhanças com o caso brasileiro,
  5. (2005). Enem deixará de ser exigência para o Prouni, Folha de São Paulo,
  6. (1992). Equality and Higher Education. In
  7. (1991). Equity and Choice.
  8. (1997). Equity in Spanish higher education.
  9. (1999). Equity, quality and efficiency effects of reform
  10. Federal Government (2003) Bases for addressing the emergency crisis of the federal universities and schedule for the Brazilian university reform. Report of the Inter-ministerial Work Group,
  11. Federal Government (2004a) Projeto de Lei 3582/2004. Subchefia de Assuntos Parlementares,
  12. Federal Government (2004b) Projeto de Lei – Sistema Especial de Reserva de Vagas. Subchefia de Assuntos Parlementares,
  13. (2004). Filantrópica ganha R$ 839,7 mil de incentivo, Folha de São Paulo,
  14. (2004). Financiamento estudantil.. Available online at http://www.mec.gov.br/Sesu/fies/
  15. (2003). GNI per capita 2003, Atlas method and PPP. Available online at http://www.worldbank.org/data/databytopic/GNIPC.pdf, accessed on 14
  16. (1997). Growth without equity? Reflections on the consequences for social cohesion of faltering progress on access to higher education.
  17. (1986). Higher Education and the State in Latin America: private challenges to public dominance .
  18. (2004). Imagining Alternativas to Global, Corporate, New Economy Academic Capitalism. Policy Futures
  19. (2004). MEC estuda loteria para financiar federais. Folha de São Paulo,
  20. (2002). Mecanismos de financiamento: a privatização dos recursos públicos,
  21. (2003). O discurso da crise e a reforma universitária necessária da universidade brasileira. In M. Mollis (Ed) Las Universidades en América Latina: ¿Reformadas o Alteradas? Buenos Aires:
  22. (1995). O Princípio Educativo da Nova Direita, in P. Gentili (Ed.) Pedagogia da Exclusão: Crítica ao Neoliberalismo em Educação.
  23. (1999). O público e o privado na educação superior brasileira: fronteira em movimento? In H. Trindade (Ed.) Universidade em Ruinas: na Repíblica dos Professores.
  24. (2004). Particulares tentam mudar Universidade para Todos. Folha de São Paulo,
  25. (2003). Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios
  26. (1995). Policy Paper for Change and Development in Higher Education.
  27. (2004). Private Higher Education: Trends in Research. In
  28. (1999). Private Prometheus: private higher education and development in the 21st century.
  29. (1986). Private sectors in higher education: structure, function and change in eight countries . Ann Arbour:
  30. (1976). Problems of securing equal access to higher education: the dilemma between equality and excellence.
  31. (2004). Reforma Universitária do Governo Lula: Reflexões para o Debate. São Paulo:
  32. (2004). Reforma universitária do governo prevê fim do vestibular.
  33. (2004). São Paulo (2004a). Negro terá prioridade em financiamento. Folha de São Paulo,
  34. (2004). São Paulo (2004b). Ministério Público consegue liminar para retirar fiador do Fies. Folha de São Paulo,
  35. (2004). São Paulo (2004c) Inscrições no Fies superam em 5 vezes benefícios disponíveis. Folha de São Paulo,
  36. (2004). Statistical Tables: Education. Available online at http://www.uis.unesco.org/TEMPLATE/html/Exceltables/education/ger_tertiary.xls , accessed 14
  37. (2004). The growth of private higher education in Brazil: implications for equity and quality.
  38. (2008). The political economy of access and equitable allocation of resources to higher education.
  39. (2002). The political economy of higher education in the era of neoliberal globalization: Latin America in comparative perspective,
  40. (1998). World Declaration on Higher Education for the Twenty-First Century: Vision and

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.