Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Trainee teachers' cognitive styles and notions of differentiation

By Carol Evans and Michael Waring

Abstract

Purpose – To compare the cognitive styles of trainee teachers with their notions of differentiation and perceptions of its place/location within their teaching and learning during a PGCE programme of ITE. Methodology – 80 trainee teachers completed the Cognitive Style Index (CSI) (Allinson & Hayes, 1996) at the beginning and at the end of their course. After completing the CSI measure trainees received instruction on cognitive styles. To assess their initial understanding and prior knowledge of differentiation, all trainees completed a questionnaire at the beginning at the end of their course. Findings – At the outset rudimentary understandings of differentiation were found to be held by the trainees, as well as stylistic differences between the four style groupings. Gains in understanding of differentiation and the use of cognitive style in school were evident in all trainees. Moderate changes in style were evident, with all trainees becoming more intuitive over the course of the programme. Research limitations – The sample size may be seen as a limitation in terms of generalisability. Practical implications –The predominant direction of cognitive style movement was from analytic to intuitive. The suggestion that cognitive style whilst relatively fixed is also something that can be developed, is a feature which should offer encouragement to those developing university courses through interventions such as this. Originality - Teaching sessions on how cognitive styles can be used in the classroom were used to enhance trainee understandings of individual learning differences and increase awareness of own style to facilitate understanding of differentiation

Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:2506

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). (Eds) International Perspectives on Individual Differences. Volume 1: Cognitive Styles,
  2. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning,
  3. (2005). Adapting Curriculum and Instruction”, doi
  4. (2006). An evaluation of innovative approaches to teacher training on the Teach First programme , Final report to the Training and Development Agency for Schools,. Institute for Policy Studies in Education, London,
  5. (1999). Approaches to Teaching and Learning: Including Pupils with Learning Difficulties,
  6. (2005). Change and Continuity in Intuition –Analysis: An Examination of the Malleability of Cognitive Style”,
  7. (2003). Complex or Unitary: A Critique and Empirical Reassessment of The Cognitive Style Index”,
  8. (2003). Connections, Neuropsychology, Neuroscience, and Learning Style” In
  9. (2000). Decision Style: Past, Present and Future Research”,
  10. (2000). Developing intuition through management education”, in
  11. (2004). Developing Teacher Sensitivity to Individual Learning Differences”, doi
  12. DfES (2007b) Making Good Progress. How can we help every pupil to make good progress at School? Department for Education and Skills,
  13. (2001). Differentiated instruction abstract, Leon County Schools,
  14. (2002). Differentiated instruction,
  15. (2001). Differentiation as a strategy for inclusive classroom practice: some difficulties identified”,
  16. (2004). Differentiation’, at Greenfield School,
  17. (2002). Effects of Cognitive Style on the Quality of Research Supervision”,
  18. (1991). Emerging as a Teacher,
  19. (2005). Evidence for Teaching and Learning,
  20. (2006). Expanding the Capacity to Learn: A New End for Education”? Keynote speech,
  21. (2004). Exploring the Relationship between Cognitive Style and Teaching Style”,
  22. (2004). Five Year Strategy for Children and Learners, Department for Education and Skills,
  23. (2006). Five Year Strategy for Children and Learners: Maintaining the Excellent Progress, Department for Education and Skills,
  24. (2005). Grading and Differentiation: Paradox or Good Practice?” Theory Into Practice,
  25. (1998). Implementing instructional adaptations for students with learning disabilities in inclusive classrooms”,
  26. (1979). Learning in the Learner’s Perspective I - Some Common Sense Perceptions,
  27. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition,
  28. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review”, Learning and Skills Research Centre,
  29. (1999). Learning Styles and Strategies: A review of research”,
  30. (2005). On the future of teacher education: challenges, context and content”,
  31. (2000). On the road to differentiated practice”,
  32. (2007). Professional Standards for Teachers Qualified Teacher Status, Training and Development Agency for Schools,
  33. (2000). Providing inclusive differentiation”, in
  34. (1978). Psychometric Theory,
  35. (2000). Reconstructing Style Differences in Thinking and Learning: Profiling Learning Performance”,
  36. (2004). Sharing Responsibility for Differentiating Instruction”,
  37. (2006). Student teachers can’t cram it all in”,
  38. (1998). Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Cognitive Style Index for business undergraduates”,
  39. (2000). The Cognitive Style Index: A Replication and Extension”,
  40. (1996). The Cognitive Styles Index: a measure of intuition-analysis for organisational research”,
  41. (2000). The Intuitive Practitioner: a critical overview”, in The Intuitive Practitioner,
  42. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promise in educational practice”,
  43. (2000). To Match or Not to Match / The Conundrum of Management Education for Reflective-Analytical Polish Managers”, in
  44. (2006). Towards Inclusive Teacher Education: Sensitising individuals to how they learn”,
  45. (2005). Uncertainty and Innovation”,
  46. (2007). Vision- Report of the Teaching and Learning

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.