Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Students as Rational Decision-Makers: The Question of Beliefs and Attitudes

By Alice Sullivan

Abstract

Rational choice theorists have analysed rates of participation in post-compulsory education, and, in particular, class differentials in these rates. Various claims have been made about the motivations of student decision-makers, but these claims have not been grounded empirically. This paper will assess the question of whether students’ attitudes to education and beliefs about their own academic abilities vary according to social background and gender. Evidence is presented that students’ attitudes to education do not vary greatly according to gender or social background, but that both the social background and gender of students affect their perception of their own abilities

Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:1871

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1981). A Most Respectable Prejudice,
  2. (1991). Academic and Non-academic Influences on the College Destinations of
  3. (1981). Academic Expectations and the School Attainment of Young Children.
  4. (2005). Academic Self-Concept, Interest, Grades, and Standardized Test Scores: Reciprocal Effects Models of Causal Ordering. Child Development.
  5. (1989). Accuracy of Proxy Reports of Parental Status Characteristics,
  6. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later?
  7. (2004). Anxiety, working memory, gender and math performance. Personality and Individual Differences.
  8. (1988). Attitudes and Gender Differences.
  9. (1995). Bargaining Experiments in A.
  10. (1976). Cognitivedevelopmental factors in emerging sex differences in achievement-related expectancies,
  11. (2001). Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment.
  12. (2000). Cultural Capital, Rational Choice and Educational Inequalities.
  13. (2005). Do Parents’ Academic Gender Stereotypes Influence Whether they Intrude on their Children’s Homework? Sex Roles,
  14. (1993). Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation.
  15. (1974). Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality.
  16. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.
  17. (1997). Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory.
  18. (1999). Explaining Sex Differences in Educational Choice: An empirical assessment of a rational choice model,
  19. (1971). Explanation and Understanding. doi
  20. (1992). Gender Bias in Examinations: how equal are the opportunities?
  21. (1993). Goals as determinants of non-linear non-compensatory judgement strategies. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes,
  22. (1993). Influence of behavior perceptions and gender on teachers' judgements of students' academic skill
  23. (1982). Judgement Under Uncertainty.
  24. (1978). Minority Education and Caste.
  25. (1972). On So-called Practical Inference, doi
  26. (2000). Parental Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment in the Netherlands: A Refinement of the Cultural Capital Perspective.
  27. (2000). Parents’ education, cognitive ability, educational expectations and educational attainment: Interactive effects.
  28. (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. (New Haven,
  29. (1987). Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries.
  30. (1998). Rational Action Theory for Sociology,
  31. (1986). Rationality in Psychology and Economics. In:
  32. (1988). Teacher expectations and specific judgements - a small scale study of the effects of certain non-cognitive variables on teachers' academic predictions Educational Review,
  33. (1994). The Art of Self Persuasion.
  34. (1983). The bases of teacher expectancies: a metaanalysis
  35. (1982). The New Partnership: Women and Men in Organisations.
  36. (1945). The Open Society and its Enemies.
  37. (1983). The Person Positivity Bias,
  38. (1994). The Role of Values in Rational Choice Theory,
  39. (2004). The Widening Socio-economic Gap
  40. (1983). Ulysses and the Sirens.
  41. (1987). Were they Pushed or did they Jump? (Cambridge:
  42. (1990). What Might Rationality Fail to
  43. (1990). When Rationality Fails. In:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.