Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Multi-disciplinary research ethics review: is it feasible?

By Priscilla Alderson and Virginia Morrow
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ioe.ac.uk.oai2:1850

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A Code of Conduct for Psychologists (Leicester:
  2. (2002). A Code of Ethics for Social Work and Social Care Research
  3. (2004). A code to keep away judges, juries and MPs.
  4. (2003). A Review of Ethics and Social Science Research for the Strategic Forum for the Social Sciences, Commissioned by the ESRC. Summary (York: SATSU,
  5. (1966). A Short History of Ethics
  6. (2003). An applied and qualitative LREC reflects on its practice.
  7. (2003). An excess of governance? Social Research and Local Research Ethics Committees.
  8. (2004). British Education Research Association.
  9. (2001). British Medical Association.
  10. (1993). British Sociological Association.
  11. (2003). BSA working in partnership with SPA: ethics in social research.
  12. (2004). Bureaucracy of ethics applications.
  13. (2003). Children in clinical research: a conflict of moral values.
  14. (1977). Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Medical and Behavioral Research.
  15. (2002). Critical Commentary: A Code of Ethics for Social Work and Social Care Research.
  16. (2004). Developing a Framework for Social Science Research Ethics: Project Update for ESRC (York: SATSU,
  17. (1999). Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice (ASA).
  18. (2001). Ethics and feminist research: theory and practice,
  19. (2003). Ethics and the ruling relations of research production.
  20. (2002). Ethics in Qualitative Research
  21. (2002). Ethics revisited.
  22. (2004). Ethics, Social Research and Consulting with Children and Young People (Barkingside: Barnardo's).
  23. (1986). Feminism and Philosophy
  24. (1993). Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel.
  25. (2003). Guidelines for Research (London: NCB). NCH - National Children's Homes.
  26. (2004). Guidelines for Research among Children and Young People
  27. (2004). Implementing the ESRC Research Ethics Framework: The Case for Research Ethics Committees (York: SATSU,
  28. (2004). International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
  29. (2001). Learning from Bristol. Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery 1984-1995. Cm5207. London: Stationery Office.
  30. (1985). Medical Research with Children: Ethics, Law and Practice (Oxford:
  31. (2004). Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population.
  32. (2005). Opinion. Getting permission for social research is now a nightmare.
  33. (1993). Postmodern Ethics
  34. (2005). Power: a Radical View (Basingstoke:
  35. (1996). Qualitative Research in Healthcare (London:
  36. (1992). reprinted, see RCPCH.
  37. (2002). Research and Development in Social Care: Governance and Good Practice.
  38. (2001). Research Ethics and Confidentiality
  39. (2004). Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost?
  40. (2004). Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care; Implementation Plan for Social Care. (London: Department of Health).
  41. (2002). Research/Consultation Guidelines
  42. (2005). Researchers and their ‘subjects’.
  43. (2001). revised 2003) Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (London: Department of Health).
  44. (2005). See http://www.corec.org.uk, accessed
  45. (2002). Social Research Association.
  46. (1994). Spreading the Word on Research
  47. (2004). The Ethical Governance and Regulation of Student Projects: a draft proposal.
  48. (1993). The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation (Cambridge:
  49. (1999). The Ethics of Clinical Research in Developing Countries (London: Nuffield Foundation).
  50. (2002). The ethics of listening to children: findings from a feasibility study for Barnardo’s. Paper to Politics of Childhood Conference,
  51. (1992). The ethics of open methods.
  52. (1998). The ethics of participatory research with children,
  53. (2004). University Research Ethics Committees: their role, remit and conduct.
  54. (2000). World Medical Association.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.