Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Process and impact evaluation of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment

By Kaaren R Mathias and Ben Harris-Roxas
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). (Eds): Hauora: Maori standards of health IV. A study of the years
  2. (2002). A framework for the evidence base to support Health Impact Assessment.
  3. (2005). Advisory Committee: A guide to Health Impact Assessment: a policy tool for New Zealand.
  4. (2007). Advisory Committee: An idea whose time has come – new opportunities for Health Impact Assessment in New Zealand public policy and planning.
  5. (1999). AK: Healthy cities and the city planning process – a background document on links between health and urban planning. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organisation – Regional Office for Europe;
  6. (2001). Alconbury Airfield Development Health Impact Assessment evaluation: Report for Cambridgeshire Health Authority. C a m b r i d g e : A n g l i a C l i n i c al Audit and Effectiveness Team;
  7. (2005). An HIA on the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. A presentation in Planning Health Into Melbourne Conference.
  8. (2008). An Impact Evaluation of the Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment.
  9. (2003). Assessing Health Impact Assessment: multidisciplinary and international perspectives.
  10. Assessing the impacts on health of an urban development strategy: a case study of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy.
  11. (2004). C: An analysis of the benefits of a cross-sectoral approach to a prospective Health Impact Assessment of a container port development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review
  12. (2008). Case study of the Christchurch UDS HIA.
  13. (2003). Commission: Evaluation of the Health Impact Assessments on the draft mayoral strategies for London. London: London Health Commission;
  14. (2005). Cooke A: Developing a framework to assess costs and benefits of Health Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review
  15. (2006). Council: A summary of the Health Impact Assessment report of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy.
  16. Council: Healthy Christchurch – Christchurch City Health Development Plan Proposal (Internal Report).
  17. (2006). Council: Healthy Housing Index.
  18. (2006). Council: Urban Development Strategy Community Charter.
  19. (2006). Economics Consortium: Cost Benefit Analysis of Health Impact Assessment – Final report.
  20. (1998). Estimated time and costs of Health Impact Assessments.
  21. (2003). Evaluating Health Impact Assessment. London: Health Development Agency;
  22. (2005). Evaluating the impact of HIA on urban reconstruction decision-making. Who manages whose risks? Environmental Impact Assessment Review
  23. (2003). Fit for purpose' Health Impact Assessment: a realistic way forward. Public Health
  24. (1999). for Health Policy: Health impact assessment: main concepts and suggested approach.
  25. (2005). Francis S: Making effective links to decision-making: key challenges for Health Impact Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review
  26. (2005). Health Board: Healthy Eating Active Living Action Plan 2005–2010.
  27. (2002). Health Impact Assessment – A review of reviews. London: Health Development Agency;
  28. (2006). Health Impact Assessment – Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Options.
  29. (2000). Health Impact Assessment in the New Zealand policy context.
  30. (2008). Health Impact Assessment of the Christchurch Transport Interchange Project – Phase One.
  31. (2008). Health Impact Assessment on the Central Plains Water Scheme.
  32. (2008). Health Impact Assessment: A training resource for HIA. Sydney: UNSW Centre for Health Equity Training, Research and Evaluation (CHETRE);
  33. (2008). Health Promotion and Sustainability Through Environmental Design: a Guide for Planning.
  34. (1995). Health: Health Impact Assessment Guidelines.
  35. HIA: a practitioner's guide. In Health Impact Assessment Edited by: Kemm
  36. (2009). How do we make Health Impact Assessment fit for purpose? Public Health 2003, 117(5):301-304.BMC Public Health
  37. (2008). Institutionalising Health Impact Assessment: the New Zealand experience. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
  38. (2002). Internal Affairs: Local Government Act.
  39. (2003). LC: Evaluation as a key part of Health Impact Assessment: the English experience. Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  40. (2007). Learning by doing: the value of case studies of Health Impact Assessment.
  41. (1991). Ministry for the Environment: Resource Management Act.
  42. (2000). Ministry of Health: The New Zealand Health Strategy.
  43. (2001). Morgan RK: Health Impact Assessment in Australia and New Zealand: an exploration of methodological concerns.
  44. (2007). Natural Resources Regional Plan (NRRP) – Groundwater Allocation and Policy Implementation
  45. (2001). politics, and public health.
  46. (2005). Process evaluation of the Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment.
  47. (2005). R: A Health Impact Assessment of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy.
  48. (2007). Reflections on ways HIA can be made most useful to local government in NSW. Sydney: Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity,
  49. Strengthening health, wellbeing and equity: embedding policy-level HIA in New Zealand.
  50. (2004). Taylor LC: Evaluating Health Impact Assessment. Public Health
  51. (2007). The effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment. Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. Copenhagen:
  52. (2004). The Finningley Airport HIA: a case study.
  53. (2005). The health impacts of urban development option of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy.
  54. (1989). The politics of public health London: Zed Books;
  55. (2005). The positioning of Health Impact Assessment in local government in Victoria. Melbourne: Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences,
  56. (2004). Urban Development Forum: Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy – So many options which will you choose?
  57. (2006). Use of Health Impact Assessment in incorporating health considerations in decision making.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.