Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

What is the point: will screening mammography save my life?

By John D Keen and James E Keen
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (2008). Ayanian JZ: Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in Medicare health plans.
  2. (1998). Benefits and risks of screening mammography for women in their forties: a statistical appraisal.
  3. (2003). Breast cancer, mammography, and malpractice litigation: the controversies continue.
  4. (2002). Calculated risks: how to know when numbers deceive you.
  5. (2008). Cancer detection and early prevention facts and figures.
  6. (2008). Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.
  7. (2004). Commentary: screening mammography: a decision analysis.
  8. (1999). D: Lifetime risk of developing coronary heart disease. Lancet
  9. (2008). Devcan: Probability of Developing and Dying of Cancer Software,
  10. (1994). DJ: Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA
  11. (2007). Does the marginal benefit exceed the marginal cost? Radiology
  12. (2003). Edwards A: Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. BMJ
  13. (2007). EE: Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med
  14. (2006). Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet
  15. (2003). Elmore JG: Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.
  16. (2005). Feuer EJ: Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer.
  17. (2005). Film or digital mammographic screening?
  18. (2001). Fischhoff B: Women's views on breast cancer risk and screening mammography: a qualitative interview study. Med Decis Making
  19. (2009). Flawed Inferences About Screening Mammography's Benefit Based on Observational Data.
  20. (2008). Frangos AJ: Recent trends in mammography utilization in the Medicare population: is there a cause for concern? J Am Coll Radiol
  21. (2006). Fryback DG: Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
  22. (2006). GH: Screening mammography at 40–49 years: regret or no regret? Lancet
  23. (2005). Gigerenzer G: Benign breast disease – the risks of communicating risk.
  24. (2007). Gotzsche PC: Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study.
  25. (2006). Gotzsche PC: Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography. BMJ
  26. (1999). Guyatt GH: Users' guides to the medical literature: XVII. How to use guidelines and recommendations about screening. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA
  27. (2002). HG: All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening.
  28. (1997). HG: Screening for disease.
  29. (1997). HG: The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med
  30. (2000). HG: US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. BMJ
  31. (2005). Houssami N: Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ
  32. (2008). How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
  33. If I choose not to participate in regular screening mammography how long will I live if I develop breast cancer?
  34. (2007). Increased cardiovascular mortality more than fifteen years after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a population-based study.
  35. (2005). Informed consent for mammography screening: modelling the risks and benefits for American women. Health Expect
  36. (2008). JB: Laypersons' understanding of relative risk reductions: randomised cross-sectional study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
  37. (2005). Kramer BS: Cancer screening in theory and in practice.
  38. (2007). Local therapy and survival in breast cancer.
  39. (2006). Mammograms: Digital vs.
  40. (2003). Mammography screening: are women really giving informed consent?
  41. (2008). Nonmammographic screening for breast cancer.
  42. (2008). Plewes D: Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med
  43. (2008). Program Devcan database: "SEER 17 Incidence and Mortality, 2000–2004, with Kaposi Sarcoma and Mesothelioma". In
  44. (1973). Program Devcan database: "SEER 9 Incidence and Mortality, 1975–2005, Follow-back year =
  45. (1994). RG: Valuing health for policy : an economic approach.
  46. (2008). Risk communication formats for low probability events: an exploratory study of patient preferences. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
  47. (1988). RS: An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment.
  48. (2003). SA: Screening for cancer: when is it valid? – Lessons from the mammography experience. Radiology
  49. (2006). Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  50. (2002). Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale.
  51. (2007). Screening mammography for women 40 to 49 years of age: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med
  52. (1998). Screening mammography for women in their forties. Breast Dis
  53. SH: Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
  54. (2004). Should I be tested for cancer? : maybe not and here's why.
  55. (2007). Society guidelines still advise yearly mammography for women aged 40–49 years.
  56. (2005). Some current issues in breast cancer screening.
  57. (2009). Strahilevitz MA: The power of pink: cause-related marketing and the impact on breast cancer.
  58. (2005). Sumkin JH: Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice. Radiology
  59. (2005). SW: Information and involvement preferences of women in their 40s before their first screening mammogram. Arch Intern Med
  60. (2008). SW: Informed decision making before initiating screening mammography: does it occur and does it make a difference? Health Expect
  61. (2004). SW: Number needed to screen: lives saved over 20 years of follow-up in mammographic screening.
  62. (2004). TH: The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am
  63. (2003). The utility of mammography for women 40 to 50 years of age.
  64. (1995). TJ: Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews. BMJ
  65. (1995). Tosteson AN: Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age.
  66. Trends in non-fatal traffic injuries: 1996–2005.
  67. (2007). TS: Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern? Cancer
  68. (1997). Using numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice. Ann Intern Med
  69. (1997). Variation of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with age.
  70. (2004). Welch HG: Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA
  71. (2007). Woloshin S: Participation in mammography screening. BMJ
  72. (2003). Women need better information about routine mammography. BMJ
  73. (2006). Women's knowledge about breast cancer risk and their views of the purpose and implications of breast screening – a questionnaire survey. J Public Health (Oxf)
  74. (2003). Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.