Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Large-Scale Selective Sweep among Segregation Distorter Chromosomes in African Populations of Drosophila melanogaster

By Daven C. Presgraves, Pierre R. Gérard, Anjuli Cherukuri and Terrence W. Lyttle


Segregation Distorter (SD) is a selfish, coadapted gene complex on chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster that strongly distorts Mendelian transmission; heterozygous SD/SD+ males sire almost exclusively SD-bearing progeny. Fifty years of genetic, molecular, and theory work have made SD one of the best-characterized meiotic drive systems, but surprisingly the details of its evolutionary origins and population dynamics remain unclear. Earlier analyses suggested that the SD system arose recently in the Mediterranean basin and then spread to a low, stable equilibrium frequency (1–5%) in most natural populations worldwide. In this report, we show, first, that SD chromosomes occur in populations in sub-Saharan Africa, the ancestral range of D. melanogaster, at a similarly low frequency (∼2%), providing evidence for the robustness of its equilibrium frequency but raising doubts about the Mediterranean-origins hypothesis. Second, our genetic analyses reveal two kinds of SD chromosomes in Africa: inversion-free SD chromosomes with little or no transmission advantage; and an African-endemic inversion-bearing SD chromosome, SD-Mal, with a perfect transmission advantage. Third, our population genetic analyses show that SD-Mal chromosomes swept across the African continent very recently, causing linkage disequilibrium and an absence of variability over 39% of the length of the second chromosome. Thus, despite a seemingly stable equilibrium frequency, SD chromosomes continue to evolve, to compete with one another, or evade suppressors in the genome

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (1980). A modified model of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster.
  2. (2000). A new statistic for detecting genetic differentiation.
  3. (1997). A test of neutrality based on interlocus associations.
  4. (1972). An investigation of the components of segregation distorter systems in Drosophila melanogaster.
  5. (2006). Approximate Bayesian inference reveals evidence for a recent, severe bottleneck in a Netherlands population of Drosophila melanogaster.
  6. (1992). Aquadro CF
  7. (1996). Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.
  8. (1997). Barbadilla A
  9. (1993). Cheaters sometimes prosper: distortion of mendelian segregation by meiotic drive.
  10. (2002). Chromosomal inversion polymorphism in Afrotropical populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
  11. (2007). Chromosome-wide linkage disequilibrium as a consequence of meiotic drive.
  12. (2003). Closing the (Ran)GAP on segregation distortion in Drosophila.
  13. (1973). Complementation analysis of male fertility among the segregation distorter chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster.
  14. (2005). Crosstalk between the actin cytoskeleton and Ran-mediated nuclear transport.
  15. (1982). Defective histone transition during spermiogenesis in heterozygous Segregation Distorter males of Drosophila melanogaster.
  16. (2005). Detecting selective sweeps with haplotype tests: Hitchhiking and haplotype tests.
  17. (2007). Distinctly different sex ratios in African and European populations of Drosophila melanogaster inferred from chromosomewide single nucleotide polymorphism data.
  18. (2003). DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods.
  19. (2008). Drive and sperm: evolution and genetics of male meiotic drive.
  20. (1977). Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster.
  21. (1969). Dysfuntional sperm production in Drosophila melanogaster males homozygous for the segregation distorter elements.
  22. (1967). Evidence for sperm dysfunction as the mechanism of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster.
  23. (1984). Factors influencing the effect of segregation distortion in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
  24. (1974). Genetic dissection of segregation distortion. I. Suicide combinations of SD genes.
  25. (2000). Genetic partners in crime: Evolution of ultraselfish supergene that specializes in sperm sabotage.
  26. Hartl DL (submitted) Signatures of selection on the genes of the Winters sex-ratio in Drosophila simulans. Molecular Biology and Evolution.
  27. (1960). Heterozygous effects on viability, fertility, rate of development, and longevity of Drosophila chromosomes that are lethal when homozygous.
  28. (1975). High frequency of one element of Segregation Distorter in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
  29. (1976). Histone transition during spermiogenesis is absent in segregation distorter males of Drosophila melanogaster.
  30. (2000). Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.
  31. (2006). Inferring the demographic history and rate of adaptive substitution in Drosophila.
  32. (1959). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. The cytogenetic basis of segregation distortion.
  33. (1960). Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.I V .I n s t a b i l i t ya tt h eSegregation-Distorter locus.
  34. (1996). Molecular evolution of the sex-ratio inversion complex in Drosophila pseudoobscura: analysis of the esterase-5 gene region.
  35. (1991). Molecular evolution of ultraselfish genes of meiotic drive systems.
  36. (1999). Molecular population genetics of the rp49 gene region in different chromosomal inversions of Drosophila subobscura.
  37. (2004). Non-African populations of Drosophila melanogaster have a unique origin.
  38. (2001). Nuclear mislocalization of enzymatically active RanGAP causes segregation distortion in Drosophila.
  39. (1983). On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Deletion mapping and dosage analysis of the SD locus.
  40. (1991). On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. V. Molecular analysis of the Sd locus.
  41. (1978). Population dynamics of the segregation distorter polymorphism of Drosophila melanogaster.
  42. (1993). Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex.
  43. (1974). Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. II. Linkage modification in the Segregation Distorter system.
  44. (2007). Population genomics: Whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans.
  45. (1996). Rapid evolution of a coadapted gene complex: evidence from the Segregation Distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive in Drosophila melanogaster.
  46. (2003). Regulating access to the genome: nucleocytoplasmic transport throughout the cell cycle.
  47. (2008). Saunders A
  48. (1990). Segregation Distorter (SD)i nDrosophila melanogaster: genetic and molecular analysis.
  49. (1991). Segregation Distorters.
  50. (1975). Segregation distortion in natural and artificial populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
  51. (2002). Segregation distortion induced by wildtype RanGAP
  52. (1976). Segregation distortion.
  53. (2008). Selective sweeps in a 2-locus model for sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila simulans.
  54. (2005). Spatial coordination of spindle assembly by chromosome-mediated signaling gradients.
  55. (1994). Stabilizer of Segregation Distortion.
  56. (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
  57. (2005). Statistical tests of the coalescent model based on the haplotype frequency distribution and the number of segregating sites.
  58. (1984). Suppressor systems of segregation distorter (SD) chromosomes in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
  59. (1972). The genetic structure of chromosomes carrying Segregation Distorter.
  60. (2006). Trivers RA
  61. (1999). Truncated RanGAP encoded by the Segregation Distorter locus of Drosophila.
  62. (1991). Why is Mendelian segregation so exact?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.