Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies in obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine

By Kimiko A Broeze, Brent C Opmeer, Lucas M Bachmann, Frank J Broekmans, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Sjors FPJ Coppus, Neil P Johnson, Khalid S Khan, Gerben ter Riet, Fulco van der Veen, Madelon van Wely and Ben WJ Mol
Topics: Study Protocol
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2667527
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). AJ: Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
  2. (1996). Ancient Egyptian medicine. Trans Med Soc Lond
  3. (1988). BG: Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response.
  4. (1999). Bossuyt PM: Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.
  5. (1997). Bossuyt PM: The accuracy of serum chlamydial antibodies in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril
  6. (2005). Broekmans FJ: Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level. Fertil Steril
  7. (2006). Broekmans FJ: The clomiphene citrate challenge test for the prediction of poor ovarian response and nonpregnancy in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review. Fertil Steril
  8. (2006). Broekmans FJ: Value of ovarian reserve testing before IVF: a clinical decision analysis. Hum Reprod
  9. (2001). Chien PF: Evaluation of a clinical test. I: assessment of reliability. BJOG
  10. (2007). Collaborative Effort of Clinical Evaluation in Reproductive Medicine (CECERM): Calculate the probability of a spontaneous ongoing pregnancy within 1 year.
  11. (2000). Communicating statistical information. Science
  12. (2003). de Vet HC, Lijmer JG: The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem
  13. (1994). der: Aan de wieg van de toekomst. scenario's voor de zorg rond de menselijke voortplanting 1995–2010. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum BV,
  14. (1998). Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA
  15. (1978). Feinstein AR: Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.
  16. (1995). Feinstein AR: Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. JAMA
  17. (1994). Foundations of medical diagnosis: what actually are the parameters involved in Bayes' theorem? Stat Med
  18. (1997). Grobbee DE: Limitations of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and bayes' theorem in assessing diagnostic probabilities: a clinical example. Epidemiology
  19. (2007). Improving the existing diagnostic strategy by accounting for characteristics of the women in the diagnostic work up for postmenopausal bleeding. BJOG
  20. (2008). JH: The combined effect of age and basal follicle-stimulating hormone on the cost of a live birth at assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril
  21. (1992). JS: Spectrum bias in the evaluation of diagnostic tests: lessons from the rapid dipstick test for urinary tract infection. Ann Intern Med
  22. (2001). Khan KS: Evaluation of a clinical test. II: Assessment of validity. BJOG
  23. (2002). Khan KS: Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature.
  24. (2002). KS: Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review. BMJ
  25. (2003). KS: Probability analysis for diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in postmenopausal bleeding: an approach for a rational diagnostic workup. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
  26. (1996). Kucharczyk W: The effect of spectrum bias on the utility of magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potentials in the diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis. Neurology
  27. (1997). LA: Meta-analyses using individual patient data.
  28. (2006). Lambalk CB: A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update
  29. (2002). Linde A van der: Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit.
  30. (1998). Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med
  31. (1995). Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy.
  32. (1998). Modern epidemiology Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven;
  33. (2004). Mol BW: Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography in diabetic or obese women with postmenopausal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol
  34. (2006). Mol BW: Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative. Fertil Steril
  35. (2002). NJ: Endometrial thickness as a test for endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol
  36. (1993). Parmar MK: Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? Lancet
  37. (1999). PF: Misleading authors' inferences in obstetric diagnostic test literature.
  38. (2003). Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate.
  39. (2002). Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. Lancet
  40. (1986). PX: Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ
  41. (1995). Redekop WK, Bossuyt PM: The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril
  42. (2005). Screening to prevent pre-term birth – systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling.
  43. (2008). Segars JH: A new approach to ovarian reserve testing. Fertil Steril
  44. (2003). Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology): NVOG richtlijn Abnormaal vaginaal bloedverlies in de menopauze [in Dutch]. NVOG guideline Abnormal vaginal bleeding during menopause.
  45. (2004). Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology): NVOG richtlijn Dreigende vroeggeboorte [in Dutch]. NVOG guideline Partus prematurus imminens.
  46. (2004). Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med
  47. (2001). Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests.
  48. (2003). te Velde ER: Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril
  49. (2002). ter Riet G: Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study. BMJ
  50. (2004). ter Riet G: MRC HSRC Workshop Report.
  51. (2003). ter Riet G: Systematic reviews with individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic tests.
  52. (1984). The assessment of diagnostic tests. A survey of current medical research. JAMA
  53. (1991). Thornbury JR: The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making
  54. (2002). WC: Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation. Ann Intern Med
  55. (1991). WF: Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril
  56. (2008). Zwinderman AH: Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. Clin Chem

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.