Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity

By Nadia Bolognini, Alvaro Pascual-Leone and Felipe Fregni


Therapies for motor recovery after stroke or traumatic brain injury are still not satisfactory. To date the best approach seems to be the intensive physical therapy. However the results are limited and functional gains are often minimal. The goal of motor training is to minimize functional disability and optimize functional motor recovery. This is thought to be achieved by modulation of plastic changes in the brain. Therefore, adjunct interventions that can augment the response of the motor system to the behavioural training might be useful to enhance the therapy-induced recovery in neurological populations. In this context, noninvasive brain stimulation appears to be an interesting option as an add-on intervention to standard physical therapies. Two non-invasive methods of inducing electrical currents into the brain have proved to be promising for inducing long-lasting plastic changes in motor systems: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). These techniques represent powerful methods for priming cortical excitability for a subsequent motor task, demand, or stimulation. Thus, their mutual use can optimize the plastic changes induced by motor practice, leading to more remarkable and outlasting clinical gains in rehabilitation. In this review we discuss how these techniques can enhance the effects of a behavioural intervention and the clinical evidence to date

Topics: Review
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum
  2. (2006). A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke
  3. (2003). A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.
  4. (2005). A: Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain.
  5. (2001). A: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human prefrontal cortex induces dopamine release in the caudate nucleus.
  6. (1997). BR: A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke
  7. (2007). Buccino G: Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage
  8. (1995). C: Exercise and brain neurotrophins. Nature
  9. (2008). C: Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning.
  10. (2000). Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke? Disabil Rehabil
  11. (2008). Can the 'yin and yang' BDNF hypothesis be used to predict the effects of rTMS treatment in neuropsychiatry? Med Hypotheses
  12. (2008). Cauraugh JH: Movement-dependent stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence. Neuropsychologia
  13. (2002). Cavus I: Slow transcranial magnetic stimulation, long-term depotentiation, and brain hyperexcitability disorders.
  14. (1997). Cohen LG: Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology
  15. (2005). Cohen LG: Drivers of brain plasticity.
  16. (2005). Cohen LG: Improvement of motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  17. (2004). Cohen LG: Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol
  18. (2006). Cohen LG: Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol
  19. (2004). Cortical reorganization – effects of intensive therapy. Restor Neurol Neurosci
  20. (2003). Dagher A: Striatal dopamine release induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain
  21. (2003). de Noordhout AM: Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol
  22. (2007). Debanne D: Plasticity of neuronal excitability: Hebbian rules beyond the synapse. Arch Ital Biol
  23. (2006). Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? Curr Opin Neurol
  24. (1996). Donoghue JP: Long-term depression of horizontal connections in rat motor cortex.
  25. (2005). Effectiveness of unilateral and symmetrical bilateral task training for arm during the subacute phase after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil
  26. (2003). Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  27. (1998). F: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation activates specific regions in rat brain.
  28. (2004). Facilitation of visuo-motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans.
  29. (1992). Frackowiak RS: Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol
  30. (1985). Freeston IL: Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet
  31. (2007). Fregni F: Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci
  32. (1999). Friel KM: Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. Rev Neurol (Paris)
  33. (1999). Goodman WK: Effects of left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on depressed mood, cognition, and corticomotor threshold. Biol Psychiatry
  34. (2003). Grunhaus L: Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression.
  35. (1985). GS: Effects of unilateral and bilateral training in a reaching task on dendritic branching of neurons in the rat motor-sensory forelimb cortex. Behav Neural Biol
  36. (2006). Guedes RC: After-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cortical spreading depression. Neurosci Lett
  37. (2007). Guedes RC: Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation coupled with repetitive electrical stimulation on cortical spreading depression. Exp Neurol
  38. (2004). Hausenblas HA: Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta-analysis.
  39. (2005). Hebb's synapse and learning rule: a history and commentary. Neurosci Biobehav Rev
  40. (1997). High frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation mimics the effects of ECS in upregulating astroglial gene expression in the murine CNS. Brain Res Mol Brain Res
  41. (2003). Homberg V: Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke. Brain
  42. (2000). Humpel C: Chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances c-fos in the parietal cortex and hippocampus. Brain Res Mol Brain Res
  43. (2005). Ikoma KS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke
  44. (1998). Impairment and disability: their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  45. (1998). Implicit and explicit learning in an auditory serial reaction time task. Acta Neurol Scand
  46. (2002). Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol
  47. (1995). Influence of physiotherapeutic facilitation techniques on motor evoked potentials in centrally paretic hand extensor muscles. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
  48. (2008). Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1 Hz repetitive transcranical magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke.
  49. (2007). JC: Exploring Theta Burst Stimulation as an intervention to improve motor recovery in chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol
  50. (2005). JC: Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology
  51. (2005). JC: Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron
  52. (1998). JP: Strengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning. Nat Neurosci
  53. (2006). K: Homeostatic effects of plasma valproate levels on corticospinal excitability changes induced by 1 Hz rTMS in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol
  54. (1969). LA: An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  55. (2004). LG: Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation.
  56. (2004). LG: Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol
  57. (2000). LG: Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
  58. (2003). LG: Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive.
  59. (2006). LG: Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. NeuroRx
  60. (1998). LG: Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice.
  61. (1998). LG: The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
  62. (2006). LG: Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol
  63. (2000). Long-term depression and depotentiation in the sensorimotor cortex of the freely moving rat.
  64. (1996). Long-term potentiation and long-term depression of horizontal connections in rat motor cortex. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)
  65. (2000). Long-term repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and cholecystokinin mRNA, but not neuropeptide tyrosine mRNA in specific areas of rat brain. Neuropsychopharmacology
  66. (2004). Marcolin MA: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is as effective as fluoxetine in the treatment of depression in patients with Parkinson's disease.
  67. (2001). Matyas TA: Responses of the densely hemiplegic upper extremity to bilateral training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  68. (2005). Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Postgrad Med J
  69. (2005). Merabet LB: The plastic human brain cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci
  70. (1995). Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills.
  71. (2007). Motor impairment rehabilitation post acquired brain injury. Brain Inj
  72. (2006). Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol
  73. (2004). Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke. Prog Neurobiol
  74. (2007). MR: Systematic literature review of treatment interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis following stroke. Occup Ther Int
  75. (2003). NC: Perceptions and experiences of two survivors of stroke who participated in constraint-induced movement therapy home programs.
  76. (1995). Neuromodulation and cortical function: modeling the physiological basis of behavior.
  77. (2006). NeuroRx
  78. (2008). Nitsche MA: Limited impact of homeostatic plasticity on motor learning in humans. Neuropsychologia
  79. (2000). Nudo RJ: Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem
  80. (2004). Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke. Clin Rehabil
  81. (2004). Outlasting excitability shifts induced by direct current stimulation of the human brain. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol
  82. (2000). Pascual-Leone A: Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability. Exp Brain Res
  83. (2002). Pascual-Leone A: Modulation of input-output curves by low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol
  84. (2009). Pascual-Leone A: Noninvasive human brain stimulation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2007, 9:527-565.Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  85. (2006). Pascual-Leone A: rTMS combined with motor learning training in healthy subjects. Restor Neurol Neurosci
  86. (2002). Pascual-Leone A: Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol
  87. (2007). Pascual-Leone A: Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol
  88. (2005). Pascual-Leone A: Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport
  89. (2006). Pascual-Leone A: Transcranial magnetic stimulation and stroke: a computer-based human model study. Neuroimage
  90. (2004). Paulus W: Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by Dcycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology
  91. (2003). Paulus W: Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans.
  92. (2007). Paulus W: Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex.
  93. (2009). Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimula-Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  94. (2003). Pharmacology of transcranial direct current stimulation: missing effect of riluzole. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol
  95. (2002). PM: Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain
  96. (2004). Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex.
  97. (1999). Rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation in auditory cortex induces LTP and LTD and impairs discrimination learning of frequency-modulated tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl
  98. (2005). Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke
  99. (2006). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke
  100. (1994). Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
  101. (2004). Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  102. (2004). Rossini PM: TMS in cognitive plasticity and the potential for rehabilitation. Trends Cogn Sci
  103. (2000). Sackeim HA: Transcranial magnetic stimulation: applications in basic neuroscience and neuropsychopharmacology.
  104. (2004). SB: Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci
  105. (2006). SC: Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery
  106. (2009). SC: Safety and behavioral effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke. Stroke
  107. (2007). SE: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.
  108. (2006). Selective attention deficits and subjective fatigue following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology
  109. (2007). SG: Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci
  110. (2006). SJ: Mental practice with motor imagery: evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  111. (2006). SL: Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol
  112. (1996). Substrates and mechanisms for learning in motor cortex. Acquisition and Mechanisms for Learning in Motor Cortex
  113. (2001). Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology
  114. (1992). Synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampus associated with learning. Behav Brain Res
  115. (2003). TA: Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol Res
  116. (2002). TA: Unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in adult rats facilitate motor skill learning with the "unaffected" forelimb and training-induced dendritic structural plasticity in the motor cortex.
  117. (2000). Taub E, Weiller C: Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke
  118. (2004). Taub E: Constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke hemiparesis and other disabilities. Restor Neurol Neurosci
  119. (2003). Tergau F: Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.
  120. (1986). The long and the short of long-term memory – a molecular framework. Nature
  121. (2008). Tonali PA: Modulating cortical excitability in acute stroke: a repetitive TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol
  122. (2003). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Suppl Clin Neurophysiol
  123. (2007). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and muscle contraction to enhance stroke recovery: a randomized proof-of-principle and feasibility investigation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  124. (2007). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: experimental framework and human models. Exp Brain Res
  125. (2002). Ugurbil K: Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke.
  126. (1994). Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  127. (2007). W: Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.
  128. (2002). WB: Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature
  129. (1994). Weiller C: Imaging recovery of function following brain injury. Curr Opin Neurobiol
  130. (2007). Zecevic D: Dendritic signals from rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons during coincident preand post-synaptic activity: a combined voltage- and calciumimaging study.
  131. (2002). Zwarts MJ: Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.