Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Performance of random forest when SNPs are in linkage disequilibrium

By Yan A Meng, Yi Yu, L Adrienne Cupples, Lindsay A Farrer and Kathryn L Lunetta
Topics: Methodology Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). A: Random Forests.
  2. (2000). Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. Ann Stat
  3. (2006). Alvarez de Andrés S: Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest.
  4. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning
  5. (1984). CJ: Classification and Regression Trees.
  6. (2005). Eerdewegh P: Identifying SNPs predictive of phenotype using random forests. Genet Epidemiol
  7. (2004). Eerdewegh P: Screening large-scale association study data: exploiting interactions using random forests.
  8. (2002). GA: Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous.
  9. (2007). Impact of Linkage Disequilibrium and Effect Size on the Ability of Machine Learning Methods to Detect Epistasis in Case-Control Studies.".
  10. (2007). KL: Two-stage approach for identifying single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with heumatoid arthritis using random forests and Bayesian networks.
  11. (2007). König IR: Picking single-nucleotide polymorphisms in forests.
  12. (1990). Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs.
  13. (2007). PLINK: a tools set for whole-genome association and population based linkage analyses.
  14. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning
  15. (2008). RV: Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures.
  16. (1996). Shapire RE: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm.
  17. (2008). Zeileis A: Conditional variable importance for random forests.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.