Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Towards agreement on best practice for publishing raw clinical trial data

By Iain Hrynaszkiewicz and Douglas G Altman

Abstract

Many research-funding agencies now require open access to the results of research they have funded, and some also require that researchers make available the raw data generated from that research. Similarly, the journal Trials aims to address inadequate reporting in randomised controlled trials, and in order to fulfil this objective, the journal is working with the scientific and publishing communities to try to establish best practice for publishing raw data from clinical trials in peer-reviewed biomedical journals. Common issues encountered when considering raw data for publication include patient privacy – unless explicit consent for publication is obtained – and ownership, but agreed-upon policies for tackling these concerns do not appear to be addressed in the guidance or mandates currently established. Potential next steps for journal editors and publishers, ethics committees, research-funding agencies, and researchers are proposed, and alternatives to journal publication, such as restricted access repositories, are outlined

Topics: Editorial
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2662833
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Citations

    1. (2008). Altman DG: Helping editors, peer reviewers, and authors improve the clarity, completeness, and transparency of reporting health research.
    2. (1929). Application of statistical methods in physiology. Physiol Rev
    3. Australian Social Science Data Archive [ h t t p : /
    4. (2008). Chapman WW: A review of journal policies for sharing research data.
    5. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): COPE code of conduct for editors of biomedical journals.
    6. (2007). Council: The use of personal health information in medical research: general public consultation
    7. (2007). Digital preservation service provider models for institutional repositories: towards distributed services. DLib Magazine
    8. Editors: Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals.
    9. (2006). External Working Group on the Registration and
    10. Final National Institutes of Health (NIH) statement on sharing research data [http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/
    11. (2007). Fridsma DB: Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE
    12. (2007). HC: Reproducible research: moving toward research the public can really trust. Ann Intern Med
    13. Health of South Africa: Guidelines for good practice in the conduct of clinical trials in human participants in South Africa.
    14. (2008). I: Publication of clinical trials supporting successful new drug applications: a literature analysis. PLoS Med
    15. (2006). joint statement clarifying publishers' views on access to raw data, data sets, and databases
    16. (2004). Limited access data sets from studies funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Clin Trials
    17. Lung and Blood Institute policy for distribution of data [http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/resources/deca/ policy_new.htm]
    18. (1997). Making original data from clinical studies available for alternative analyses.
    19. Medical Research Council policy on data sharing and preservation [http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Ourresearch/Ethicsresearchguid ance/Datasharinginitiative/Policy/MRC002551]
    20. (2008). on behalf of the caBIG Data Sharing and Intellectual Capital Workspace: Towards a data sharing culture: recommendations for leadership from academic health centers. PLoS Med
    21. PLoS Medicine editorial and publishing policies [http://jour nals.plos.org/plosmedicine/policies.php]
    22. (2006). PM: Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomized trials. Trials
    23. (2007). Replication standards for quantitative social science: why not sociology? Sociol Methods Res
    24. Research Committee: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) frequently asked questions.
    25. (2008). Research Information Network: To share or not to share: publication and quality assurance of research data outputs
    26. (2001). S h e r l o c k G , S p e l l m a n
    27. (2001). Sa ER: Code of conduct is needed for publishing raw data. BMJ
    28. The Dataverse Network Project homepage [http://the data.org]
    29. Wellcome Trust policy on data management and sharing [http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Policy-and-positionstatements/WTX035043.htm]
    30. (2006). Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials. Trials

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.