Location of Repository

When coordinating movements, the nervous system often has to decide how to distribute work across a number of redundant effectors. Here, we show that humans solve this problem by trying to minimize both the variability of motor output and the effort involved. In previous studies that investigated the temporal shape of movements, these two selective pressures, despite having very different theoretical implications, could not be distinguished; because noise in the motor system increases with the motor commands, minimization of effort or variability leads to very similar predictions. When multiple effectors with different noise and effort characteristics have to be combined, however, these two cost terms can be dissociated. Here, we measure the importance of variability and effort in coordination by studying how humans share force production between two fingers. To capture variability, we identified the coefficient of variation of the index and little fingers. For effort, we used the sum of squared forces and the sum of squared forces normalized by the maximum strength of each effector. These terms were then used to predict the optimal force distribution for a task in which participants had to produce a target total force of 4–16 N, by pressing onto two isometric transducers using different combinations of fingers. By comparing the predicted distribution across fingers to the actual distribution chosen by participants, we were able to estimate the relative importance of variability and effort of 1∶7, with the unnormalized effort being most important. Our results indicate that the nervous system uses multi-effector redundancy to minimize both the variability of the produced output and effort, although effort costs clearly outweighed variability costs

Topics:
Research Article

Publisher: Public Library of Science

OAI identifier:
oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2661023

Provided by:
PubMed Central

Download PDF:- (2002). A computational model of muscle recruitment for wrist movements.
- (2001). ATP utilization for calcium uptake and force production in different types of human skeletal muscle fibres.
- (2006). Bayesian statistical modeling.
- (2007). Computational motor control: redundancy and invariance.
- (2007). Decision theory: what ‘‘should’’ the nervous system do?
- (2007). Optimal Control Theory. In: Bayesian Brain Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding.
- (2002). Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.
- (2007). Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation.
- (1998). Quantization of human motions and learning of accurate movements.
- (1981). Robust statistics.
- (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.
- (1981). Spatial control of arm movements.
- (1999). Step-tracking movements of the wrist. IV. Muscle activity associated with movements in different directions.
- (2005). Stochastic optimal control and estimation methods adapted to the noise characteristics of the sensory motor system.
- (2002). Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks.
- (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.
- (2001). The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance.
- (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movement.
- (1985). The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.
- (2000). Variability and noise in continuous force production.
- (2007). Why don’t we move faster? Parkinson’s disease, movement vigor, and implicit motivation.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.