Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Geographic profiling applied to testing models of bumble-bee foraging

By Nigel E. Raine, D. Kim Rossmo and Steven C. Le Comber


Geographic profiling (GP) was originally developed as a statistical tool to help police forces prioritize lists of suspects in investigations of serial crimes. GP uses the location of related crime sites to make inferences about where the offender is most likely to live, and has been extremely successful in criminology. Here, we show how GP is applicable to experimental studies of animal foraging, using the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris. GP techniques enable us to simplify complex patterns of spatial data down to a small number of parameters (2–3) for rigorous hypothesis testing. Combining computer model simulations and experimental observation of foraging bumble-bees, we demonstrate that GP can be used to discriminate between foraging patterns resulting from (i) different hypothetical foraging algorithms and (ii) different food item (flower) densities. We also demonstrate that combining experimental and simulated data can be used to elucidate animal foraging strategies: specifically that the foraging patterns of real bumble-bees can be reliably discriminated from three out of nine hypothetical foraging algorithms. We suggest that experimental systems, like foraging bees, could be used to test and refine GP model predictions, and that GP offers a useful technique to analyse spatial animal behaviour data in both the laboratory and field

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: The Royal Society
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (1999). A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar.
  2. (0038). A report of essential findings from a study of serial arsonists. Quantico, VA: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime.
  3. (2006). A test of spatial memory and movement patterns of bumblebees at multiple spatial and temporal scales.
  4. (2006). Adaptation, genetic drift, pleiotropy, and history in the evolution of bee foraging behavior.
  5. (1979). Bumblebee economics.C a m b r i d g e ,M A :
  6. (1997). Bumblebee movement in a fragmented agricultural landscape.
  7. (1994). Comparisons of forager distributions from matched honey bee colonies in suburban environments.
  8. (1998). Crime scene and distance correlates of serial rape.
  9. (2006). Declines in forage availability for bumblebeesat a nationalscale.Biol.
  10. (1986). Environmental-change and the distributions of British bumble bees (Bombus Latr).
  11. (2007). Estimating nest locations of bumblebee Bombus ardens fromflowerqualityanddistribution.Ecol.
  12. (2006). Facultative use of repellent scent mark in foraging bumblebees: complex versus simple flowers.
  13. (2008). Foraging distance in Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae).
  14. (2000). Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumblebees, Bombus spp. (Hym., Apidae), in an agricultural landscape.
  15. (2005). Geographic heuristics or shortcuts to failure? Response to Snook et al.
  16. (2007). Geographic profiling and animal foraging
  17. (2006). Geographic profiling and animal foraging.
  18. (2007). Geographic profiling of terrorist attacks.
  19. (2000). Geographical profiling. Boca Ration, FL:
  20. (2000). Long-range foraging by the honey-bee,
  21. (2003). Non-lethal sampling of DNA from bumble bees for conservation genetics.
  22. (2006). Spatial patterns of Indian serial burglars with relevance to geographical profiling.
  23. (2007). The adaptive significance of sensory bias in a foraging context: floral colour preferences in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris.
  24. (1990). The aftermath of the Yorkshire Ripper: the response of the United Kingdom police service.
  25. (2008). The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees.
  26. (2004). Why do honey bees dance?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.