Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Testing significance relative to a fold-change threshold is a TREAT

By Davis J. McCarthy and Gordon K. Smyth


Motivation: Statistical methods are used to test for the differential expression of genes in microarray experiments. The most widely used methods successfully test whether the true differential expression is different from zero, but give no assurance that the differences found are large enough to be biologically meaningful

Topics: Original Papers
Publisher: Oxford University Press
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t-test and statistical inferences of gene changes.
  2. (2004). A case study on choosing normalization methods and test statistics for two-channel microarray data.
  3. (2003). A random variance model for detection of differential gene expression in small microarray experiments.
  4. (2006). Comparison and evaluation of methods for generating differentially expressed gene lists from microarray data.
  5. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.
  6. (2005). Cross-platform comparability of microarray technology: intraplatform consistency and appropriate data analysis procedures are essential.
  7. (2003). DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery.
  8. (2006). Empirical array quality weights for microarray data.
  9. (2001). Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment.
  10. (2005). Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, with application to DNA microarray data.
  11. (2008). Functional and metabolic remodelling in GLUT4-deficient heartsconfershyper-responsivenesstosubstrateintervention.
  12. (2005). Identification and functional significance of genes regulated by structurally different histone deacetylase inhibitors.
  13. (2005). Limma: linear models for microarray data. In
  14. (2004). Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments.
  15. (1996). Parallel human genome analysis: microarray-based expression monitoring of 1000 genes.
  16. (2006). Performance comparison of one-color and two-color platformswithintheMicroArrayQualityControl(MAQC)project.Nat.Biotechnol.,
  17. (2002). Replicated microarray data.
  18. (2001). Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response.
  19. (2005). Significance testing for small microarray experiments.
  20. (2002). Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence. Chapman & Hall/CRC,
  21. (1974). Theoretical Statistics.
  22. (2008). Transcriptome analysis of the normal human mammary cell commitment and differentiation process.
  23. (1996). Use of a cDNA microarray to analyse gene expression patterns in human cancer.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.