Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: a questionnaire survey

By Debby van Helvoort-Postulart, Trudy van der Weijden, Benedict GC Dellaert, Mascha de Kok, Maarten F von Meyenfeldt and Carmen D Dirksen
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (2005). An online survey of chiropractors' opinions of continuing education. Chiropractic & Osteopathy
    2. (1992). Association: Conjoint analysis: a guide for designing and interpreting conjoint studies.
    3. (2008). CD: Discrete choice experiments for complex health care decisions: does hierarchical information integration offer a solution? Health Econ
    4. (1997). Christakis NA: Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.
    5. (2000). Evans WK: Estimates of the lifetime costs of breast cancer treatment in Canada.
    6. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet
    7. (2005). Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice
    8. (2000). Measuring perceived service quality using integrated conjoint experiments.
    9. Meyenfeldt von M: Breast cancer surgery in ambulatory setting: blessing or curse.
    10. (2005). MJ: E-mail versus Web survey response rates among health education professionals. AJHS
    11. (1999). Patients, doctors and contracts: an application of principle-agent theory to the doctor-patient relationship.
    12. (1998). Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies.
    13. (2000). Stated choice methods: analysis and application Cambridge
    14. (2001). Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care
    15. (2007). Tailoring quality improvement interventions to identified barriers: a multiple case analysis.
    16. (1994). Timmermans HJP: Modeling hierarchical conjoint processes with integrated choice experiments.
    17. (2006). TJ: Maximising responses to discrete choice experiments: a randomized trial. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
    18. (2000). Twenty years of implementation research. Fam Pract
    19. (1999). Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. Soc Sci Med
    20. (2003). Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.