Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Producer Nutritional Quality Controls Ecosystem Trophic Structure

By Just Cebrian, Jonathan B. Shurin, Elizabeth T. Borer, Bradley J. Cardinale, Jacqueline T. Ngai, Melinda D. Smith and William F. Fagan


Trophic structure, or the distribution of biomass among producers and consumers, determines key ecosystem values, such as the abundance of infectious, harvestable or conservation target species, and the storage and cycling of carbon and nutrients. There has been much debate on what controls ecosystem trophic structure, yet the answer is still elusive. Here we show that the nutritional quality of primary producers controls the trophic structure of ecosystems. By increasing the efficiency of trophic transfer, higher producer nutritional quality results in steeper ecosystem trophic structure, and those changes are more pronounced in terrestrial than in aquatic ecosystems probably due to the more stringent nutritional limitation of terrestrial herbivores. These results explain why ecosystems composed of highly nutritional primary producers feature high consumer productivity, fast energy recycling, and reduced carbon accumulation. Anthropogenic changes in producer nutritional quality, via changes in trophic structure, may alter the values and functions of ecosystems, and those alterations may be more important in terrestrial ecosystems

Topics: Research Article
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier:
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles


  1. (1994). A stoichiometric analysis of the zooplanktonphytoplankton interaction in marine and freshwater ecosystems.
  2. (2006). All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs.
  3. (2007). Allometric scaling of plant life history.
  4. (2000). Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems.
  5. (1995). Biomass distribution in freshwater plankton communities.
  6. (1997). Biomass distribution in marine planktonic communities.
  7. (1998). Biostatistical Analysis 4 th edn.
  8. (2007). Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean.
  9. (1960). Community structure, population control, and competition.
  10. (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere 1 st edn.
  11. (1993). Hairson NG Sr
  12. (1997). Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems.
  13. (2006). Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2.
  14. (2001). Nutrient limitation reduces food quality for zooplankton: Daphnia response to seston phosphorus enrichment.
  15. (2000). Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs.
  16. (1993). Patterns in decomposition rates among photosynthetic organisms: the importance of detritus C:N:P content.
  17. (1999). Patterns in the fate of production in plant communities.
  18. (2004). Patterns of herbivory and decomposition in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
  19. (1995). Plant growth-rate dependence of detrital carbon storage in ecosystems.
  20. (2004). Role of first-order consumers in ecosystem carbon flow.
  21. (1999). Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses.
  22. (1994). The dependence of herbivory on growth rate in natural plant communities.
  23. (2007). The primacy of top-down effects in shallow benthic ecosystems.
  24. (1999). The stoichiometry of consumer-driven nutrient recycling: theory, observations, and consequences.
  25. (1942). The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology.
  26. (2002). Toward sustainability in world fisheries.
  27. (2007). Trophic levels and trophic tangles: The prevalence of omnivory in real food webs.
  28. (1957). Trophic structure and productivity of Silver Springs,
  29. (2006). Why biodiversity is important to oceanography: potential roles of genetic, species and trophic diversity in pelagic ecosystem processes.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.