Article thumbnail

18FDG PET and Ultrasound Echolucency in Carotid Artery Plaques

By Martin Græbe, Sune F. Pedersen, Liselotte Højgaard, Andreas Kjær and Henrik Sillesen


ObjectivesThe objective was to evaluate inflammation in echolucent carotid artery plaques.BackgroundUltrasound echolucency of carotid artery plaques has been proven to differentiate patients at high risk of stroke. On the other hand, positron emission tomography (PET) of plaques with the use of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) identifies highly inflamed plaques, and the combination of molecular imaging and morphology could improve identification of vulnerable plaques.MethodsA total of 33 patients with cerebrovascular symptoms and carotid artery plaques were included prospectively for ultrasound and PET imaging. Plaque standardized gray scale medians (GSM) were measured in longitudinal ultrasound images to quantitate echolucency, and GSM values were compared with FDG PET uptake quantified by maximum standardized uptake values (SUV). Symptomatic plaques were compared with contralateral carotid artery plaques considered asymptomatic, and in 17 symptomatic patients, endarterectomized plaque specimens were analyzed for CD68 expression.ResultsThere was a negative correlation between GSM and FDG SUV (r = −0.56, p < 0.01). Whereas echo-rich plaques tended to show low FDG uptake, echolucent plaques ranged from high to low inflammatory activity, as depicted with PET. Quantitative FDG SUV differentiated asymptomatic from symptomatic plaques, whereas GSM values did not. There was a positive correlation between CD68 expression and FDG uptake (r = 0.50, p = 0.04).ConclusionsOur results substantiate previous findings of an association between plaque FDG uptake and inflammation. Echolucent plaques exhibit a wide range of inflammatory activity, whereas echorich plaques show little inflammation. FDG PET may be useful for further stratification of echolucent plaques being either active (vulnerable) or inactive

Publisher: American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.01.001
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.