Article thumbnail

A New Evaluation Tool to Obtain Practice-Based Evidence of Worksite Health Promotion Programs

By Diane O Dunet, Phillip B. Sparling, James Hersey, Pamela Williams-Piehota, Mary D Hill, Michele Reyes, Carl Hanssen and Frances Lawrenz
Topics: Original Research
Publisher: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2578781
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). A purchaser’s guide to clinical preventive services: moving science into coverage. Washington (DC): National Business Group on Health;
  2. Concurrent meta-evaluation: a critique. Am J Eval.
  3. Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in public health.
  4. (2003). Employment size of employer and nonemployer firms.
  5. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation
  6. (2007). Guide to community preventive services. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  7. Healthy people in healthy places: healthy workplaces. In: Health protection goals and objectives. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;
  8. (1996). Home-based workers: data from the 1990 Census of Population. Mon Labor Rev
  9. (1998). Obesity and absenteeism: an epidemiologic study of 10,825 employed adults.
  10. Obesity and risk of nonfatal unintentional injuries.
  11. (2005). Preventing childhood obesity: health in the balance. Washington (DC): National Academies Press;
  12. Promising practices in promotion of healthy weight at small and mediumsized US worksites. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5(4).
  13. (2008). Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us
  14. State-level estimates of annual medical expenditures attributable to obesity.
  15. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity.
  16. (1999). The health and productivity cost burden of the “top 10” physical and mental health conditions affecting six large U.S. employers in
  17. (1994). The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. The program evaluation standards. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA):
  18. The relationship of body mass index, medical costs, and job absenteeism.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.