Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

"Looking behind the veil": invisible corporate intangibles, stories, structure and the contextual information content of disclosure

By J. Holland

Abstract

<b>Purpose</b> – This paper aims to use a grounded theory approach to reveal that corporate private disclosure content has structure and this is critical in making "invisible" intangibles in corporate value creation visible to capital market participants.\ud \ud <b>Design/methodology/approach</b> – A grounded theory approach is used to develop novel empirical patterns concerning the nature of corporate disclosure content in the form of narrative. This is further developed using literature of value creation and of narrative.\ud \ud <b>Findings</b> – Structure to content is based on common underlying value creation and narrative structures, and the use of similar categories of corporate intangibles in corporate disclosure cases. It is also based on common change or response qualities of the value creation story as well as persistence in telling the core value creation story. The disclosure is a source of information per se and also creates an informed context for capital market participants to interpret the meaning of new events in a more informed way.\ud \ud <b>Research limitations/implications</b> – These insights into the structure of private disclosure content are different to the views of relevant information content implied in public disclosure means such as in financial reports or in the demands of stock exchanges for "material" or price sensitive information. They are also different to conventional academic concepts of (capital market) value relevance.\ud \ud <b>Practical implications</b> – This analysis further develops the grounded theory insights into disclosure content and could help improve new disclosure guidance by regulators.\ud \ud <b>Originality/value</b> – The insights create many new opportunities for developing theory and enhancing public disclosure content. The paper illustrates this potential by exploring new ways of measuring the value relevance of this novel form of contextual information and associated benchmarks. This connects value creation narrative to a conventional value relevance view and could stimulate new types of market event studies

Topics: HG
Publisher: Emerald
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:24872
Provided by: Enlighten

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). (2006a), ‘Fund management, intellectual capital, intangibles and private disclosure’, doi
  2. (2006). 32 nd EIBA,
  3. (2004). 38: Intangible Assets, IASB Web Summaries,
  4. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. doi
  5. (2005). A grounded theory of corporate disclosure’, doi
  6. (2002). A New Companies Bill,
  7. (1984). A survey of the methods used by UK Investment analysts to appraise investments in ordinary shares’, doi
  8. (1997). Accounting information, corporate governance, and stock market efficiency: A study of information flows between finance directors, analysts and fund managers, Paper presented at BAA,
  9. (1989). An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients’, doi
  10. (1996). and G Stoner,‘Dissemination of price sensitive information and management of voluntary corporate disclosure’, doi
  11. (2003). ASB Revised Statement , 'Operating and Financial Review'
  12. (2002). Authority, ‘Investment research: Conflicts & other issues’,
  13. (2001). B,‘Financial Institutions, intangibles, and corporate governance’, doi
  14. (1998). B,‘Influence and intervention by Financial Institutions in their investee companies’, doi
  15. (2001). Bukh,‘Valuing the future; Intellectual Capital supplements at doi
  16. (1988). Communication and Power in Organizations: Discourse, Ideology and Domination, doi
  17. (2007). Corporate disclosure, the learning organisation, and the management of expectations’, Paper presented at APIRA conference,
  18. (2004). Corporate intangibles, value relevance, and disclosure content’, ICAS Research Report,
  19. (2003). Demand and Supply of Information on Intangibles -The Case of Knowledge-Intense Companies’,
  20. (1988). Doing research in organisations', doi
  21. (1985). E, Competitive Advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, doi
  22. (1980). E, Competitive strategy: techniques for analysing industries and competitors, doi
  23. (2002). Financial institutions and corporate governance : a dynamic model of corporate governance’ CIMA research report, doi
  24. (1998). Financial Institutions, private acquisition of corporate information, and fund management’, doi
  25. (2001). Grounded Theory in Management Research’, doi
  26. (1999). Have Financial Statements Lost their Relevance?’, doi
  27. (2001). Improving Business Reporting: Insights into Voluntary disclosures’,
  28. (2006). In the mirror of the market: the disciplinary effect of company/fund manager meetings’. doi
  29. (1977). Information inductance and its significance for accounting. doi
  30. (2001). Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting’,(June),Brookings Institute,
  31. (2001). Intellectual capital and the 'capable firm': Narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge&quot;, doi
  32. (1996). Investor relations: meeting the analysts, ICAS,
  33. (2002). Lin S ,’Shareholder wealth effects of CEO departures: evidence from the UK‘, doi
  34. (1993). Lockheed Case’
  35. (1999). Measures that matter, The Ernst and
  36. (2003). Moving towards the Implementation of 2005 International Accounting Standards&quot; presented by AASB Chairman Keith Alfredson to the ENG Investors Relations Business Forum, held on
  37. (1993). Narrative Analysis’,
  38. (2001). Narrative Methods for Organizational & doi
  39. (1999). on ‘Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital: Experience, Issues and Prospects’,
  40. (1996). Organizational story and story telling:’. doi
  41. (1998). Ownership structure, firm performance and top executive change: an analysis of UK firms. doi
  42. (2002). Presentation on Governance Metrics International’, at the 1st International Conference on Corporate Governance: &quot;Corporate Governance Developments and New Tools of Governance&quot; at doi
  43. (1998). Private Disclosure and Financial Reporting’, doi
  44. (1993). Recruitment mode affecting informant response', doi
  45. (2006). Regional and national drivers of business location and competiveness’ Opening plenary session, 19.00-20.30, 7 th
  46. (1988). Reliability and Validity in Field Research: Some Strategies and Tactics', doi
  47. (1991). resources and sustained competitive advantage’, doi
  48. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Williams R (ed), 'Contact: Human communications and its history', doi
  49. (2001). Soft Numbers, Hard Returns. The effect of Intangible Assets on Corporate Performance', PhD,
  50. (1999). The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them’. doi
  51. (1996). The Capitalisation, Amortisation and Value of R&D’.
  52. (1990). The core competence of the corporation, doi
  53. (2001). The Final Report of Company Law Review,
  54. (2006). The MNE as a creator, fashioner, and respondent to
  55. (1997). The new organisational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge based assets, Berret-Koehler, doi
  56. (1987). The Political Function of Narrative in Organizations. doi
  57. (2004). Using Case studies in finance’. Chapter 4 in ‘Qualitative Research, ‘A 'real-life' guide to accounting research’, edited by C.Humphreys, doi
  58. (2003). Value relevant information on corporate intangibles - creation, use, and barriers in capital markets’ - 'between a rock and a hard place’ Special issue, doi
  59. (2003). What is in a story ? The relationship between narrative completeness and adjustment to relationship dissolution’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.