Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Banks' risk assessment of Swedish SMEs

By V. Bruns and M. Fletcher

Abstract

Building on the literatures on asymmetric information and risk taking, this paper applies conjoint experiments to investigate lending officers' probabilities of supporting credit to established or existing SMEs. Using a sample of 114 Swedish lending officers, we test hypotheses concerning how information on the borrower's ability to repay the loan; alignment of risk preferences; and risk sharing affect their willingness to grant credit. Results suggest that features that reduce the risk to the bank and shift the risk to the borrower have the largest impact. The paper highlights the interaction between factors that influence the credit decision. Implications for SMEs, banks and research are discussed

Topics: HG, HB
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:33406
Provided by: Enlighten

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1990). A c counting theory .
  2. (1966). A Catalogue and Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and A symmetric Fractional Factorial Designs .
  3. (2007). A commentary on gaps in fundi ng for moderate ‘non-stellar’ growth small businesses in the United Kingdom”, Venture Capital: An doi
  4. (1992). An application of metric conjoint analysis for the evaluation of top managers' individual strategic decision making processes. doi
  5. (1997). An Enhanced Paradigm of Entrepreneurial Business Planning .
  6. (1995). Business plans handbook .
  7. (1997). C onjoint analysis: A window of opportunity for entrepreneurship research.”
  8. (1999). Conjoi nt Analysis: A New Methodological Approach for Researching the Decision Policies of Venture Capitalists, Venture Capital: An doi
  9. (2001). Conjoint Analysis as an Instrument of Market Research Practice . doi
  10. (1994). Expl oring strategic judgment: Methods for testing the assumptions of prescriptive contingency theories. doi
  11. (1993). Financing the Small Firm Start-Up: Determinants of Debt Use.”
  12. (1985). How to write a winning business plan. doi
  13. (1992). Hybrid c onjoint analysis: An estimation probe in new venture decisions. doi
  14. (1976). Meckling doi
  15. (1990). Modern Corporate Finance . doi
  16. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. doi
  17. (1985). Sma ll Business Finance: doi
  18. (1990). Small Ne w Firms and the Return to Alternative Sources of Finance.” doi
  19. (1998). Successful Business Plans doi
  20. (1994). The Canadian Small Business-Bank Interface: A Recursive Model.
  21. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. doi
  22. (1991). The entrepreneurial search for capital: a behavioural science perspective.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, doi
  23. (1989). The Incidence of Secured Debt: doi
  24. (1996). Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European venture capitalists. doi
  25. (2004). What do investors look for in a business plan? A comparison of the investment criteria of bankers, venture capitalists and business angels”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.