Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Varieties of relationship between research and theory

By JA Rooke


This paper addresses the proposal that the Unique Adequacy (UA) requirement of methods should be employed as a criterion for research evaluation. Initially, four types of research are identified. The UA concept is employed to distinguish between these different approaches to construction management research according to their relationship to theory. It is found that the distinction between strong and weak forms of the UA requirement, combined with the distinction between empirically and theoretically driven generate a cross-classification matrix which can accommodate a wide range of approaches. It is shown that action research can resolve a paradox generated by an empty class in the matrix

Topics: TA, built_and_human_env
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). A Grounded Theory of Women's Career Under-Achievement in Large UK Construction Companies',
  2. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-Taking for Conversation', doi
  3. (1985). Action Science, Jossey-Bass,
  4. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence v. Forcing, Sociology Press,
  5. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory (second edition) doi
  6. (1997). Breaking up methodological monopolies: a multi paradigm approach to construction management research,'
  7. (1997). Constructing a Bridge: an exploration of engineering culture, design and research in nineteenth-century France and America,
  8. (2007). Criteria for evaluating research: the unique adequacy requirement of methods,'
  9. (1971). Cross-Classification,’ Discussion Papers, Series E: Social Science Methodology,
  10. (2001). Culture and Foreign Companies Choice of Entry Mode:
  11. (1997). Developing a More Empirical Approach to Culture, Attitude and Motivation in Construction Management Research: A critique and a proposal,'
  12. (2001). Grounded Theory in Ethnography',
  13. (1993). Improving Safety on Construction Sites by Changing Personnel Behaviour,
  14. (1974). Language and Social Reality, Mouton, The Hague. doi
  15. (2005). Learning, knowledge and authority on site: a case study of safety practice’,
  16. (1964). Method and Measurement in Sociology,
  17. (2002). Operating the Production Calculus: Ordering a Production System in the Print Industry. In
  18. (2004). Operationalizing culture in construction management research: a social identity perspective in the Hong Kong context,'
  19. (1990). Organising Construction: Project Organisation and Matrix Management,
  20. (2006). Organizational culture profiles of construction enterprises in China,' doi
  21. (1997). Preserving Methodological Consistency, a Reply to Raftery, McGeorge and Walters',
  22. (2005). Project affinity: the role of emotional attachment in construction projects,'
  23. (1984). Studies in Ethnomethodology,
  24. (2005). Studies of Work: Achieving Hybrid Disciplines
  25. (2001). Study of Attitude Changes in People After the Implementation of a New Safety Management System: The Supervision Plan’, doi
  26. (2003). The Claims Culture; A Taxonomy of Industry Attitudes’,
  27. (1963). The Concept of Mind,
  28. (1993). The constructive approach in management accounting research,’
  29. (1995). The culture of the industry and culture of research’, doi
  30. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research,
  31. (1995). The Firstline Supervisor in Construction: A Key to Change?’
  32. (2000). The Key Issue of Applying the Constructive Approach to Field Research,’ in T. Reponen (Ed.) Management Expertise for the New Millenium:
  33. (1952). The Perception of the Other, unpublished PhD thesis,
  34. (2003). The Role of Objects in Design Co-Operation: Communication through Physical or Virtual Objects',
  35. (1997). The role of theory in construction management research: comment,'
  36. (1970). The Sociological Imagination,
  37. (1992). Two Incommensurable, Asymmetrically Alternate Technologies of Social Analysis',

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.