Article thumbnail

Tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates: normative data

By Vicky Wei Zhang, Bradley McPherson and Zhi-Guo Zhang
Topics: Research Article
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2374766
Provided by: PubMed Central

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1990). A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear
  2. (1989). A study of the properties of click evoked otoacoustic emissions and development of a clinical otoacoustic hearing test instrument. In
  3. (1994). Avan P: Wavelet analysis of real ear and synthesized click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res
  4. (1998). Baglioni A: Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear
  5. (2002). Discrete-time speech signal processing Upper Saddle River,
  6. (2004). Durka PJ: Identification of otoacoustic emissions components by means of adaptive approximations.
  7. (1997). Durka PJ: Introduction to wavelet analysis.
  8. (1982). Elberling C: Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. II. Normative data in young adults and influence of posture. Scandinavian Audiology
  9. (1985). Evoked acoustic emission: clinical application. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl
  10. (1980). Evoked acoustic emissions from within normal and abnormal human ears – comparison with audiometric and electrocochleographic findings. Hear Res
  11. (1991). GK: A review of otoacoustic emissions.
  12. (2007). Glattke TJ: Otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications 3rd edition.
  13. (2005). Grandori F: Cochlear maturation and otoacoustic emissions in preterm infants: a time-frequency approach. Hear Res
  14. Handbook of otoacoustic emissions
  15. (2005). Inferring basilar-membrane motion from tone-burst otoacoustic emissions and psychoacoustic measurements.
  16. (2000). Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram. J Acoust Soc Am
  17. (2000). K: Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear
  18. (2000). KA: Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period. Ear Hear
  19. (1988). Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using toneburst stimuli.
  20. (1991). Lohle E: Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears and in ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
  21. (1986). Lonsbury-Martin BL: Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear Res
  22. (1987). Neely ST: Tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing subjects.
  23. (2001). Otoacoustic emissions and improved pass/fail separation using wavelet analysis and time windowing. Med Biol Eng Comput
  24. (2002). Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Br Med Bull
  25. (1994). Peripheral analysis of frequency in human ears revealed by tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res
  26. (1980). Ritsma RJ: Evoked acoustical responses from the human ear-some experimental results. Hear Res
  27. (1996). SC: Influence of acquisition parameters on the measurement of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates in a hospital environment. Audiology
  28. (2000). Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
  29. (1993). Signal reconstruction from modified auditory wavelet transform.
  30. (1993). SJ: The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions.
  31. (1996). ST: Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearingimpaired ears.
  32. (1978). Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.
  33. (2006). Tang JLF: An alternative method in neonatal hearing screening: click otoacoustic emissions plus tone-burst otoacoustic emissions.
  34. (2000). Test-retest reliability of tone-burstevoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol
  35. (2004). The effects of window delay, delinearization, and frequency on tone-burst otoacoustic emission input/output measurements.
  36. (1994). Thornhill RJ: Wavelet-type analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Biomed Sci Instrum
  37. (1997). Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res
  38. (1997). Tognola G: High resolution time-frequency analysis of otoacoustic emissions. Technol Health Care
  39. (1993). TR: Using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for neonatal hearing screening.
  40. (1998). Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss. Ear Hear
  41. (1998). Wavelet analysis of clickevoked otoacoustic emissions.
  42. (1999). Wavelet application to reduction of stimulus artifact in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions testing. J Biomed Eng (Chin)
  43. (2008). Wong BYK: Neonatal hearing screening: A combined click evoked and tone burst otoacoustic emission approach.
  44. (1996). XY: A research for basic properties of several OAEs in normal hearing subjects. Chinese Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg