Location of Repository

The analysis of relapse-free survival curves: implications for evaluating intensive systemic adjuvant treatment regimens for breast cancer

By R S Day, S E Shackney and W P Peters

Abstract

Results of adjuvant dose intensification studies in patients with localised breast cancer have raised questions regarding the clinical usefulness of this treatment strategy. Here, we develop and fit a natural history model for the time to clinical tumour recurrence as a function of the number of involved lymph nodes, and derive plausible predictions of the effects of dose intensification under various conditions. The time to tumour recurrence is assumed to depend on the residual postoperative micrometastatic burden of tumour, the fractional reduction of residual tumour burden (RTB) by treatment, and the rate of regrowth of the RTB to a clinically detectable size. It is assumed that a proportion of micrometastatic tumours are unresponsive to adjuvant chemotherapy even at maximal dose intensity. Data fitted included the San Antonio Cancer Institute (SACI) database of untreated patients, and CALGB #9082, a study comparing a highly intensive and moderately intensity adjuvant regimen in patients with 10+ positive axillary nodes. The proportion of tumours unresponsive to maximally intensive adjuvant treatment is estimated to be 48% (29–67%). The estimated log kill for intermediate-dose therapy from CALGB #9082 was 6.5 logs, compared with 9 logs or greater for high-dose therapy. The model is consistent with a modest but nonnegligible advantage of dose intensification compared with standard therapies in patients with sensitive tumours who have 10+ positive axillary nodes, and suggests that much of this clinical benefit could be achieved using intermediate levels of treatment intensification. The model further suggests that, in patients with fewer than 10 involved axillary nodes, any advantage of treatment intensification over standard therapy would be much reduced, because in patients with smaller tumour burdens of sensitive tumour, a larger proportion of cures achievable with intensified therapy could be achieved as well with standard therapy

Topics: Clinical Studies
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2361755
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Preview

    Citations

    1. (1987). Adriamycin-containing standard-dose regimens 0.41 283 Buzdar et al
    2. (2003). Arguments for this effect related to Gompertzian growth can be found (Dang
    3. (2004). Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group
    4. (1987). Group 9401 study.
    5. (1988). Inst Monogr 30: 15–28 Norton L
    6. (2005). Model for RFS curves and treatment intensification RS Day et al 51 British Journal of Cancer (2005) 92(1), 47–54 &
    7. (2005). Model for RFS curves and treatment intensification RS Day et al 52
    8. (2005). Model for RFS curves and treatment intensification RS Day et al 53 British Journal of Cancer (2005) 92(1), 47–54 &
    9. (2005). Model for RFS curves and treatment intensification RS Day et al 54

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.