Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions

By P. Adank, B. Evans, J. Stuart-Smith and S. Scotti


This study aimed to determine the relative processing cost associated with comprehension of an unfamiliar native accent under adverse listening conditions. Two sentence verification experiments were conducted in which listeners heard sentences at various signal-to-noise ratios. In Experiment 1, these sentences were spoken in a familiar or an unfamiliar native accent or in two familiar native accents. In Experiment 2, they were spoken in a familiar or unfamiliar native accent or in a nonnative accent. The results indicated that the differences between the native accents influenced the speed of language processing under adverse listening conditions and that this processing speed was modulated by the relative familiarity of the listener with the native accent. Furthermore, the results showed that the processing cost associated with the nonnative accent was larger than for the unfamiliar native accent

Topics: PE, P1
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Enlighten

Suggested articles


  1. (1985). A "rationalized" arcsine transform. doi
  2. (2001). A computerized test of speed of language comprehension unconfounded by literacy. doi
  3. (1982). Accents of English. Three volumes and cassette. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi
  4. (2005). Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. doi
  5. (2007). An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch II: regional Varieties. doi
  6. (1994). An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra.
  7. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. doi
  8. (1995). Cross-cultural cognition - developing tests for developing. doi
  9. (1986). Dialects in contact. doi
  10. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. doi
  11. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? doi
  12. (2004). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals' acquisition of English word stress patterns. doi
  13. (2004). Effects of noise and proficiency level on intelligibility of Chinese-accented English. doi
  14. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on crosslanguage perception of approximants.
  15. (1995). Foreign accent comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. doi
  16. (2001). Intelligibility of native and non-native Dutch speech. doi
  17. (2004). Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. In
  18. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. doi
  19. (1997). Mild head injury and speed of information processing: A prospective study of professional rugby league players. doi
  20. (1991). Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast. doi
  21. (1991). Perception and production: The relevance of phonetic input to L2 phonological learning. In doi
  22. (1985). Perception of synthetic speech generated by rule. doi
  23. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. doi
  24. (1990). Pitch-synchronous waveform processing technique for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. doi
  25. (2007). Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. doi
  26. (2003). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. doi
  27. (1996). Preparing a voice line-up.
  28. (1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of foreign-accented speech. doi
  29. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented speech. doi
  30. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. doi
  31. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. doi
  32. (2007). The effect of an unfamiliar regional accent on the speed of word processing.
  33. (1998). The effects of noise on the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech. doi
  34. (1999). The effects of speaker accent and target predictability on perception of mispronunciations. doi
  35. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation hypothesis.
  36. (2004). The phonology of Scottish English. doi
  37. (1992). The speed and capacity of language processing (SCOLP) test.
  38. (2005). Tuning in and tuning out: speech perception in native- and foreign-talker babble. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.