Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Probation, credibility and justice

By F. McNeill

Abstract

This paper explores the difficulties that arise for probation agencies or those that deliver community sanctions in developing and maintaining their credibility in prevailing ‘late-modern’ social conditions. It begins by questioning the limits of the pursuit and promise of ‘public protection’ as a source of credibility, and then proceeds to examine the emergence of an alternative strategy – based principally on reparation and ‘payback’ – in Scotland, arguing that these Scottish developments have much to say to the emerging debates in England and Wales (and elsewhere) about the ‘rehabilitation revolution’ and the proper use of imprisonment. The paper provides a critical account of the development and meaning of the Scottish version of ‘payback’, linking it to some important philosophical and empirical studies that may help to steer the development of payback away from a ‘merely punitive’ drift. In the conclusion, I argue that probation agencies and services need to engage much more deeply and urgently with their roles as justice services, rather than as ‘mere’ crime reduction agencies

Publisher: Sage Publications
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:43320
Provided by: Enlighten

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2010). (2009c) Towards Effective Practice in Offender Supervision. Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research, available at: http://www.sccjr.ac.uk/documents/McNeil_Towards.pdf
  2. (2006). A desistance paradigm for offender management’ doi
  3. (2008). British Crime Survey: Measuring Crime for 25 Years. London: Home Office.
  4. (2007). Community penalties, sentencers, the Media and Public Opinion’,
  5. (2007). Consumer Society, doi
  6. (2008). Crime, Criminology and Criminal Justice in doi
  7. (2007). Giving Up and Giving Back: Desistance, Generativity and Social Work with Offenders’
  8. (2001). Making Good. doi
  9. (1991). National Objectives and Standards for Social Work Services in the Criminal Justice System. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Social Work Services Group.
  10. (2003). Probation, Punishment and Restorative Justice: Should Altruism Be Engaged in Punishment?’, The Howard doi
  11. (1955). Probation. A Brief Survey of Fifty Years of the Probation Service of the City of Glasgow 1905–1955. Glasgow: City of Glasgow Probation doi
  12. (2001). Punishment, Communication and Community. doi
  13. (2006). Purposes and Functions of Sentencing’ doi
  14. (2004). Purposes Matters: The Ends of Probation’,
  15. (2010). Ranking Correctional Punishments: Views from offenders, practitioners and the public. doi
  16. (2007). Reducing Reoffending: Social Work and Community Justice in Scotland. doi
  17. (2005). Rehabilitation: Headline or Footnote in the New Penal Policy’, doi
  18. (2005). Remembering probation in doi
  19. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: communities, victims, and offender reintegration’ doi
  20. (1992). Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. doi
  21. (2008). Scottish Prisons Commission
  22. (2008). Selling the Public on Probation: doi
  23. (2000). Social Issues of Law and Order’, doi
  24. (2008). The Apology Ritual. Cambridge: doi
  25. (2001). The Culture of Control. doi
  26. (2005). The Impact of Inequality: How to Make Sick Societies Healthier. doi
  27. (2009). The Spirit Level: why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Penguin - doi
  28. (2005). Understanding Desistance from Crime. doi
  29. (2009). What Works and What’s Right’ doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.