THE UTILITY OF FUTILITY: THE CONSTRUCTION OF BIOETHICAL PROBLEMS*

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse the contemporary ‘futility discourse ’ from a con-structivist perspective. I will argue that bioethics discourse typically disregards the con-text from which controversies emerge and the processes that inform and constrain such discourse. Constructivists have argued that scientific knowledge is expressive of the dom-inant paradigm within which a scientific community is working. I will outline an analy-sis of ‘medical futility ’ as a construction of biomedical and bioethical communities (and their respective paradigms). I will trace the emergence and utilization of futility in the literature. My analysis of the context (i.e. the historical circumstances, the particular actors involved) within which the futility discourse emerged suggests that medical futility was constructed, in part, as a means of enhancing physician domination of a context wherein medical authority was threatened. The actors in this debate express widely divergent frameworks of ‘the good’, arguing from distinctive representations of moral agency. At times, this controversy has been argued from incommensurate moral horizons wherein the discussants debate incomparable problems. This discussion is related to a study of the ‘practice ’ of futility in the clinical context. Further studies on the construction of bioethical problems are a necessary condition for supporting the truth claims of bioeth-ical arguments

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

CiteSeerX

redirect
Last time updated on 12/04/2017

This paper was published in CiteSeerX.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.