Location of Repository

Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement

By Timothy Caulfield, Amy L McGuire, Mildred Cho, Janet A Buchanan, Michael M Burgess, Ursula Danilczyk, Christina M Diaz, Kelly Fryer-Edwards, Shane K Green, Marc A Hodosh, Eric T Juengst, Jane Kaye, Laurence Kedes, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Trudo Lemmens, Eric M Meslin, Juli Murphy, Robert L Nussbaum, Margaret Otlowski, Daryl Pullman, Peter N Ray, Jeremy Sugarman and Michael Timmons

Abstract

Interest in whole-genome research has grown substantially over the past few months. This article explores the challenging ethics issues associated with this work

Topics: Perspectives
Publisher: Public Library of Science
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2270329
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    Preview

    Citations

    1. (2007). 24) Gene information opens new frontier in privacy debate. Boston Globe. Available: http://www. boston.com/news/globe/health_science/ articles/2007/09/24/gene_information_ opens_new_frontier_in_privacy_debate/.
    2. (2007). 3) This human’s life, decoded. The Globe and Mail. Available: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ story/RTGAM.20070903.wgenemap0903/ BNStory/Science/home.
    3. (2007). 6) Is there a heart attack in your future?
    4. (2001). Beyond consent: Ethical and social issues in genetic testing.
    5. (1998). Beyond consent: Seeking justice in research.
    6. (2007). Biobanks and blanket consent: The proper place of the public perception and public good rationales.
    7. (1998). Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
    8. (2006). Caplan A
    9. (2004). Coding and consent: Moral challenges of the database project in Iceland.
    10. (2005). Data release and resource sharing policy.
    11. (2000). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
    12. (2006). Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.
    13. (2007). Disclosure of genetic information to at-risk relatives.
    14. (2004). Does the UK Biobank have a legal obligation to feedback individual findings to participants?
    15. editors (2006) Law and ethics in biomedical research: Regulation, conflict of interest, and liability.
    16. (2002). Ethical issues in human genome epidemiology: a case study based on the Japanese American Family Study in Seattle, Washington.
    17. (2004). Face facts: Why human genetics will always provoke bioethics.
    18. (2008). Foundation
    19. (2007). Governing genetic databases: Challenges facing research regulation and practice.
    20. (2007). Health and Human Services, National Human Genome Research Institute
    21. (2005). Human genetic research: Emerging trends in ethics.
    22. (2007). Identifiability in genomic research.
    23. (2008). James Watson’s personal genome sequence. Available: http:// jimwatsonsequence.cshl.edu/cgi-perl/gbrowse/ jwsequence/.
    24. (1991). National Institutes of Health, Office for Protection from Research Risks
    25. (2007). Personalized genomes go mainstream.
    26. (1949). Printing Office
    27. (2006). Privacy, confidentiality, and identifiability in genomic research. Discussion document for workshop convened by the National Human Genome Research Institute,
    28. (2003). Reaffirmation and extension of NHGRI rapid data release policies: Large-scale sequencing and other community resource projects.
    29. (2008). Research ethics and the challenge of wholegenome sequencing.
    30. (2007). The diploid genome sequence of an individual human.
    31. (2007). The future of personal genomics.
    32. (2004). The social and ethical issues of post-genomic biobanks.
    33. (2008). The Wellcome Trust (2003) Sharing data from large-scale biological research projects: A system of tripartite responsibility.
    34. (2007). UK Biobank ethics and governance framework version 3.0. Available: http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ethics/ documents/20071011_EGF_Version_3_1_ 0October_2007withTOR.pdf.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.