Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Executive and Judicial Overreaction in the Guantanamo Cases

By Neal K. Katyal

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court in Rasul v. Bush and Al-Odah v. United States held that detainees at Guantanamo Bay may challenge their detentions via writs of habeas corpus. Justice Stevens\u27 majority opinion held that \u22the federal courts have jurisdiction to determine the legality of the Executive\u27s potentially indefinite detention of individuals who claim to be wholly innocent of wrongdoing.\u22 This holding is potentially unbounded, perhaps enabling someone detained at Kandahar or even Diego Garcia to challenge his detention via the great writ. It appears to be a striking break from the 1950 Johnson v. Eisentrager decision, which strongly intimated that no such lawsuits were possible. How did we go from a constitutional regime where no alien outside of the United States could challenge his detention to one in which virtually anyone may be able to do so

Topics: Criminal Law, National Security Law, President/Executive Department, Supreme Court of the United States
Publisher: Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:scholarship.law.georgetown.edu:facpub-2896
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://scholarship.law.georget... (external link)
  • http://scholarship.law.georget... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.