Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

E-learning and Blindness: evaluating the quality of the learning experience to inform policy and practice

By Shirley Evans


The thesis focuses upon the use of e-learning by learners who are blind. Specifically, the research examined whether they could access and engage in e-learning and, if so, was this on the same basis and of the same quality as sighted learners? The thesis describes the development of a conceptual framework which distinguished between the activities of ‘accessing’, ‘using’ and ‘doing’ when engaging in e-learning. The framework was combined with cognitive load theory as the underpinning theoretical framework and used as a method of describing and understanding the quality of the learning experience. In the main study it was found that the two groups of learners did have a similar learning experience although it took the learners who were blind approximately twice as long to complete the task as the sighted learners. It is argued that while learners who are blind can 'access' e-learning material, even if it is designed carefully there may be a danger of excluding them from the learning experience. The thesis concludes by linking the findings to legislation in terms of specialist skills for supporting learners who are blind, accessibility and usability of e-learning materials, and funding and availability of specialist education and technology

Topics: LC Special aspects of education
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). Cultivating new relationships to digital assistive technologies. doi
  2. (2008). Defining, implementing and managing website standards.
  3. (2008). Doing Your Research Project. Milton Keynes:
  4. (2002). Implementation of Assistive Technology with Students Who Are Visually Impaired: Teachers' Readiness.
  5. (2002). Reading Between the lines: An Evaluation of WindowEyes Screen Reader as a Reference Tool for Teaching and Learning. doi
  6. (1985). Understanding Expository Text: A Theoretical and Practical Handbook for Analyzing Explanatory Text. London: Laurence Erlbaum Associates. doi
  7. (2000). Usability testing with Screen reading Technology in a Windows Environment.
  8. (2007). Virtual learning environments
  9. (1995). Voyager 2000: A Review of Accessibility for Users with Visual Disabilities. doi
  10. (1974). Working Memory.” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.