Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Rethinking Broadband Internet Access

By Daniel F Spulber and Christopher S. Yoo

Abstract

The emergence of broadband Internet technologies, such as cable modem and digital subscriber line (DSL) systems, has reopened debates over how the Internet should be regulated. Advocates of network neutrality and open access to cable modem systems have proposed extending the regulatory regime developed to govern conventional telephone and narrowband Internet service to broadband. A critical analysis of the rationales traditionally invoked to justify the regulation of telecommunications networks--such as natural monopoly, network economic effects, vertical exclusion, and the dangers of ruinous competition--reveals that those rationales depend on empirical and theoretical preconditions that do not apply to broadband. In addition, the current policy debate treats access to networks as a unitary phenomenon that fails to take into account how different types of access requirements can affect network performance in widely divergent ways. The current debate also fails to capture how individual network elements can interact in ways that can be quite unpredictable. In this Article, Professors Spulber and Yoo analyze broadband access using a theory of network configuration based on a branch of mathematics known as graph theory, which captures the interactions between individual components that cause networks to behave as complex systems. This theory yields a five-part classification system that provides insights into the effect of different types of access on network cost, capacity, reliability, and transaction costs

Topics: graph theory, complex systems, network neutrality, open access, telecommunications, natural monopoly, ruinous competition, network economic effects, vertical exclusion, cable modem, digital subscriber lines, DSL, transaction costs, Administrative Law, Communications Law, Computer Law, Digital Communications and Networking, Law and Economics, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation, Political Economy, Science and Technology Law
Publisher: Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:scholarship.law.upenn.edu:faculty_scholarship-1227
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://scholarship.law.upenn.... (external link)
  • https://scholarship.law.upenn.... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.