Article thumbnail

Public Opinion and Strict Scrutiny Equal Protection Review: Higher Education Affirmative Action and the Future of the Equal Protection Framework

By Lawrence Friedman

Abstract

Against the background of the debate over the constitutionality of state-sponsored higher education affirmative action programs, this Essay presents an account of the modern equal protection framework that balances a normative concern for the protection of individuals from discrimination and a structural concern for the counter-majoritarian difficulty. The author suggests that state-sponsored higher education affirmative action programs may survive strict scrutiny, and that proposals urging the judicial consideration of public opinion about such programs should be rejected. Even if public opinion could be accurately gauged, it should not influence the application of strict scrutiny to such programs, or play any part in equal protection review

Topics: Civil Rights and Discrimination, Education Law
Publisher: Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu:twlj-1116
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.e... (external link)
  • https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.e... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.